Resale Prices Act 1976 (repealed 1.3.2000)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
14 Exemption of goods by the Court.
(1) Upon an application under section 16 or section 17 below the Restrictive Practices Court (“the Court”) may make an order in accordance with this section directing that goods of any class shall be exempted goods for the purposes of this Part of this Act. (2) The order referred to in subsection (1) above may be made if it appears to the Court that in default of a system of maintained minimum resale prices applicable to those goods— (a) the quality of the goods available for sale, or the varieties of the goods so available, would be substantially reduced to the detriment of the public as consumers or users of those goods; or (b) the number of establishments in which the goods are sold by retail would be substantially reduced to the detriment of the public as such consumers or users; or (c) the prices at which the goods are sold by retail would in general and in the long run be increased to the detriment of the public as such consumers or users; or (d) the goods would be sold by retail under conditions likely to cause danger to health in consequence of their misuse by the public as such consumers or users; or (e) any necessary services actually provided in connection with or after the sale of the goods by retail would cease to be so provided or would be substantially reduced to the detriment of the public as such consumers or users; and in any such case that the resulting detriment to the public as consumers or users of the goods in question would outweigh any detriment to them as such consumers or users (whether by the restriction of competition or otherwise) resulting from the maintenance of minimum resale prices in respect of the goods. In this section— “necessary services”, in relation to goods, means services which, having regard to the character of the goods, are required to guard against the risk of injury, whether to persons or to premises, in connection with the consumption, installation or use of the goods, or are otherwise reasonably necessary for the benefit of consumers or users; and “consumers” and “users” include persons consuming or using for the purpose or in the course of trade or business or for public purposes.
14 Exemption of goods by the Court.
(1) Upon an application under section 16 or section 17 below the Restrictive Practices Court (“the Court”) may make an order in accordance with this section directing that goods of any class shall be exempted goods for the purposes of this Part of this Act. (2) The order referred to in subsection (1) above may be made if it appears to the Court that in default of a system of maintained minimum resale prices applicable to those goods— (a) the quality of the goods available for sale, or the varieties of the goods so available, would be substantially reduced to the detriment of the public as consumers or users of those goods; or (b) the number of establishments in which the goods are sold by retail would be substantially reduced to the detriment of the public as such consumers or users; or (c) the prices at which the goods are sold by retail would in general and in the long run be increased to the detriment of the public as such consumers or users; or (d) the goods would be sold by retail under conditions likely to cause danger to health in consequence of their misuse by the public as such consumers or users; or (e) any necessary services actually provided in connection with or after the sale of the goods by retail would cease to be so provided or would be substantially reduced to the detriment of the public as such consumers or users; and in any such case that the resulting detriment to the public as consumers or users of the goods in question would outweigh any detriment to them as such consumers or users (whether by the restriction of competition or otherwise) resulting from the maintenance of minimum resale prices in respect of the goods. In this section— “necessary services”, in relation to goods, means services which, having regard to the character of the goods, are required to guard against the risk of injury, whether to persons or to premises, in connection with the consumption, installation or use of the goods, or are otherwise reasonably necessary for the benefit of consumers or users; and “consumers” and “users” include persons consuming or using for the purpose or in the course of trade or business or for public purposes.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.