Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
18 Revocation of licence
(1) The Authority may revoke a licence on application by— (a) the person responsible, or (b) the holder of the licence (if different). (2) The Authority may revoke a licence otherwise than on application under subsection (1) if— (a) it is satisfied that any information given for the purposes of the application for the licence was in any material respect false or misleading, (b) it is satisfied that the person responsible has failed to discharge, or is unable because of incapacity to discharge, the duty under section 17, (c) it is satisfied that the person responsible has failed to comply with directions given in connection with any licence, (d) it ceases to be satisfied that the premises specified in the licence are suitable for the licensed activity, (e) it ceases to be satisfied that any premises which are relevant third party premises in relation to a licence are suitable for the activities entrusted to the third party by the person who holds the licence, (f) it ceases to be satisfied that the holder of the licence is a suitable person to hold the licence, (g) it ceases to be satisfied that the person responsible is a suitable person to supervise the licensed activity, (h) the person responsible dies or is convicted of an offence under this Act, ... (i) it is satisfied that there has been any other material change of circumstances since the licence was granted or (j) it is not satisfied that any third country premises are suitable for carrying out activities in a manner which secures that qualifying gametes or embryos imported from a third country by the holder of the licence meet standards of quality and safety laid down in this Act.
18 Revocation of licence
(1) The Authority may revoke a licence on application by— (a) the person responsible, or (b) the holder of the licence (if different). (2) The Authority may revoke a licence otherwise than on application under subsection (1) if— (a) it is satisfied that any information given for the purposes of the application for the licence was in any material respect false or misleading, (b) it is satisfied that the person responsible has failed to discharge, or is unable because of incapacity to discharge, the duty under section 17, (c) it is satisfied that the person responsible has failed to comply with directions given in connection with any licence, (d) it ceases to be satisfied that the premises specified in the licence are suitable for the licensed activity, (e) it ceases to be satisfied that any premises which are relevant third party premises in relation to a licence are suitable for the activities entrusted to the third party by the person who holds the licence, (f) it ceases to be satisfied that the holder of the licence is a suitable person to hold the licence, (g) it ceases to be satisfied that the person responsible is a suitable person to supervise the licensed activity, (h) the person responsible dies or is convicted of an offence under this Act, ... (i) it is satisfied that there has been any other material change of circumstances since the licence was granted or (j) it is not satisfied that any third country premises are suitable for carrying out activities in a manner which secures that qualifying gametes or embryos imported from a third country by the holder of the licence meet standards of quality and safety laid down in this Act.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.