Football Governance Act 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
69 Outcomes of investigations
(1) When the IFR conducts an investigation under section 68 into whether a person has committed a relevant infringement, the IFR must determine— (a) whether the person committed the infringement, and (b) if so, whether the person had a reasonable excuse for committing the infringement. (2) The IFR must give a person a closure notice where— (a) the IFR determines that the person has not committed the infringement, or (b) the IFR determines that the person has committed the infringement but is not minded to take any action as a result of that determination (whether because the person had a reasonable excuse for committing the infringement, or otherwise). (3) A closure notice is a notice— (a) stating the IFR’s determination, and (b) explaining the IFR’s determination. (4) Where the IFR has accepted a commitment from the person to whom an investigation relates (see section 70), this section does not apply in relation to the behaviour to which the commitment relates. (5) Part 8 contains provision about cases where the IFR determines that a person has committed a relevant infringement and is minded to take action as a result of that determination.
69 Outcomes of investigations
(1) When the IFR conducts an investigation under section 68 into whether a person has committed a relevant infringement, the IFR must determine— (a) whether the person committed the infringement, and (b) if so, whether the person had a reasonable excuse for committing the infringement. (2) The IFR must give a person a closure notice where— (a) the IFR determines that the person has not committed the infringement, or (b) the IFR determines that the person has committed the infringement but is not minded to take any action as a result of that determination (whether because the person had a reasonable excuse for committing the infringement, or otherwise). (3) A closure notice is a notice— (a) stating the IFR’s determination, and (b) explaining the IFR’s determination. (4) Where the IFR has accepted a commitment from the person to whom an investigation relates (see section 70), this section does not apply in relation to the behaviour to which the commitment relates. (5) Part 8 contains provision about cases where the IFR determines that a person has committed a relevant infringement and is minded to take action as a result of that determination.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.