Football Governance Act 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
75 Sanctions
(1) Part 1 of Schedule 9 sets out the action the IFR may take in relation to a person where— (a) the IFR determines that the person has, without reasonable excuse, failed to comply with an information requirement, or (b) the IFR is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the person has committed an offence under section 78. (2) In subsection (1) and in Part 1 of Schedule 9, “information requirement” means a requirement imposed by or under section 65, 66 or 72 or Schedule 8. (3) Part 2 of Schedule 9 sets out the action the IFR may take where (whether as a result of an investigation or otherwise) the IFR determines that a person has, without reasonable excuse, committed a relevant infringement (but this is subject to subsection (6)). (4) Part 3 of Schedule 9 makes provision in connection with financial penalties under paragraphs 3 and 6 of that Schedule. (5) The IFR may not take action in relation to a person under Schedule 9 in respect of an act or omission which constitutes an offence under section 78 if the person has, in relation to that act or omission, been found guilty of that offence. (6) The IFR may not take action in relation to a club where it determines that the club has, without reasonable excuse, committed a relevant infringement by virtue of paragraph 2(4)(a)(ii) of Schedule 7 (but it may, in respect of such an infringement, take action in relation to a senior manager by virtue of paragraph 5 of that Schedule).
75 Sanctions
(1) Part 1 of Schedule 9 sets out the action the IFR may take in relation to a person where— (a) the IFR determines that the person has, without reasonable excuse, failed to comply with an information requirement, or (b) the IFR is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the person has committed an offence under section 78. (2) In subsection (1) and in Part 1 of Schedule 9, “information requirement” means a requirement imposed by or under section 65, 66 or 72 or Schedule 8. (3) Part 2 of Schedule 9 sets out the action the IFR may take where (whether as a result of an investigation or otherwise) the IFR determines that a person has, without reasonable excuse, committed a relevant infringement (but this is subject to subsection (6)). (4) Part 3 of Schedule 9 makes provision in connection with financial penalties under paragraphs 3 and 6 of that Schedule. (5) The IFR may not take action in relation to a person under Schedule 9 in respect of an act or omission which constitutes an offence under section 78 if the person has, in relation to that act or omission, been found guilty of that offence. (6) The IFR may not take action in relation to a club where it determines that the club has, without reasonable excuse, committed a relevant infringement by virtue of paragraph 2(4)(a)(ii) of Schedule 7 (but it may, in respect of such an infringement, take action in relation to a senior manager by virtue of paragraph 5 of that Schedule).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.