Pension Schemes Act 2017
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
27 Content of implementation strategy
(1) This section applies for the purposes of enabling the Pensions Regulator to decide whether it is satisfied that an implementation strategy for a Master Trust scheme is adequate (see section 26(4)). (2) An implementation strategy is a document setting out how the interests of members of the scheme are to be protected following the occurrence of the triggering event. (3) An implementation strategy must include a section setting out the levels of administration charges that applied in relation to members of the scheme. (4) The strategy must set out those levels of administration charges in the manner and as at the date specified or described in regulations made by the Secretary of State. (5) An implementation strategy must include information about the following matters— (a) the continuity option that the trustees are required, or decide, to pursue (see section 23); (b) where the trustees are required, or decide, to pursue continuity option 1 (transfer of members' accrued rights and benefits and winding up)— (i) the scheme or schemes to which it is proposed that the accrued rights and benefits be transferred (if known), and (ii) when the accrued rights and benefits are expected to be transferred (where employers and members do not exercise their rights under section 24 of this Act and Part 4ZA of the Pension Schemes Act 1993); (c) where the trustees intend to pursue continuity option 2 (resolving the triggering event), how it is proposed that the triggering event should be resolved. (6) An implementation strategy must— (a) contain such other information as may be specified in regulations made by the Secretary of State, and (b) be prepared in accordance with regulations made by the Secretary of State. (7) Regulations under this section are subject to negative resolution procedure.
27 Content of implementation strategy
(1) This section applies for the purposes of enabling the Pensions Regulator to decide whether it is satisfied that an implementation strategy for a Master Trust scheme is adequate (see section 26(4)). (2) An implementation strategy is a document setting out how the interests of members of the scheme are to be protected following the occurrence of the triggering event. (3) An implementation strategy must include a section setting out the levels of administration charges that applied in relation to members of the scheme. (4) The strategy must set out those levels of administration charges in the manner and as at the date specified or described in regulations made by the Secretary of State. (5) An implementation strategy must include information about the following matters— (a) the continuity option that the trustees are required, or decide, to pursue (see section 23); (b) where the trustees are required, or decide, to pursue continuity option 1 (transfer of members' accrued rights and benefits and winding up)— (i) the scheme or schemes to which it is proposed that the accrued rights and benefits be transferred (if known), and (ii) when the accrued rights and benefits are expected to be transferred (where employers and members do not exercise their rights under section 24 of this Act and Part 4ZA of the Pension Schemes Act 1993); (c) where the trustees intend to pursue continuity option 2 (resolving the triggering event), how it is proposed that the triggering event should be resolved. (6) An implementation strategy must— (a) contain such other information as may be specified in regulations made by the Secretary of State, and (b) be prepared in accordance with regulations made by the Secretary of State. (7) Regulations under this section are subject to negative resolution procedure.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.