Propose a change

Title 26 Insurance Code

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

26-17-108. Dependents' coverage.

(a) Insurance under any group life insurance policy issued pursuant to W.S. 26-17-103, 26-17-105, 26-17-106, 26-17-109, 26-17-127 or 26-17-128 may be extended to insure the employees or members or any class of employees or members against loss due to the death of their spouses and dependent children: (i) Repealed by Laws 1990, ch. 3, §§ 2, 3. (ii) If the employer or member does not pay any part of the premium for the spouse's or dependent child's coverage, the policy shall insure all eligible employees or members with respect to their spouses and dependent children or any class of employees or members except that an insurer may exclude or limit the coverage on any spouse or dependent child if evidence of individual insurability does not satisfy the insurer; (iii) Repealed By Laws 2009, Ch. 93, § 1. (iv) Repealed by Laws 1990, ch. 3, § 3. (b) Repealed by Laws 1990, ch. 3, § 3. (c) Repealed by Laws 1990, ch. 3, § 3. (d) Repealed by Laws 1990, ch. 3, § 3. (e) Notwithstanding the provisions of W.S. 26-17-117, only one (1) certificate need be issued for each family unit if a statement concerning any dependent's coverage is included in the certificate.

Your change, as a redline

26-17-108. Dependents' coverage.

(a) Insurance under any group life insurance policy issued pursuant to W.S. 26-17-103, 26-17-105, 26-17-106, 26-17-109, 26-17-127 or 26-17-128 may be extended to insure the employees or members or any class of employees or members against loss due to the death of their spouses and dependent children: (i) Repealed by Laws 1990, ch. 3, §§ 2, 3. (ii) If the employer or member does not pay any part of the premium for the spouse's or dependent child's coverage, the policy shall insure all eligible employees or members with respect to their spouses and dependent children or any class of employees or members except that an insurer may exclude or limit the coverage on any spouse or dependent child if evidence of individual insurability does not satisfy the insurer; (iii) Repealed By Laws 2009, Ch. 93, § 1. (iv) Repealed by Laws 1990, ch. 3, § 3. (b) Repealed by Laws 1990, ch. 3, § 3. (c) Repealed by Laws 1990, ch. 3, § 3. (d) Repealed by Laws 1990, ch. 3, § 3. (e) Notwithstanding the provisions of W.S. 26-17-117, only one (1) certificate need be issued for each family unit if a statement concerning any dependent's coverage is included in the certificate.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it