Propose a change

Title 26 Insurance Code

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

26-28-114. Claims of nonresidents against domestic insurers.

(a) In a delinquency proceeding begun in this state against a domestic insurer, claimants residing in reciprocal states may file claims either with the ancillary receivers, if any, in their states or with the domiciliary receiver. The claims shall be filed on or before the last date fixed for the filing of claims in the domiciliary delinquency proceedings. (b) Controverted claims belonging to claimants residing in reciprocal states may either: (i) Be proved in this state; or (ii) If ancillary proceedings have been commenced in the reciprocal states, be proved in those proceedings. (c) If a claimant elects to prove his claim in ancillary proceedings and if notice of the claim and opportunity to appear and be heard is afforded the domiciliary receiver of this state, as provided in W.S. 26-28-115 with respect to ancillary proceedings in this state, the final allowance of the claim by the courts in the ancillary state shall be accepted in this state as conclusive as to its amount and shall also be accepted as conclusive as to its priority, if any, against special deposits or other security located within the ancillary state.

Your change, as a redline

26-28-114. Claims of nonresidents against domestic insurers.

(a) In a delinquency proceeding begun in this state against a domestic insurer, claimants residing in reciprocal states may file claims either with the ancillary receivers, if any, in their states or with the domiciliary receiver. The claims shall be filed on or before the last date fixed for the filing of claims in the domiciliary delinquency proceedings. (b) Controverted claims belonging to claimants residing in reciprocal states may either: (i) Be proved in this state; or (ii) If ancillary proceedings have been commenced in the reciprocal states, be proved in those proceedings. (c) If a claimant elects to prove his claim in ancillary proceedings and if notice of the claim and opportunity to appear and be heard is afforded the domiciliary receiver of this state, as provided in W.S. 26-28-115 with respect to ancillary proceedings in this state, the final allowance of the claim by the courts in the ancillary state shall be accepted in this state as conclusive as to its amount and shall also be accepted as conclusive as to its priority, if any, against special deposits or other security located within the ancillary state.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it