Propose a change

Title 26 Insurance Code

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

26-38-203. Standards for policy provisions.

(a) No Medicare supplement insurance policy or certificate in force in the state shall contain benefits which duplicate benefits provided by Medicare. (b) The commissioner shall adopt reasonable regulations to establish specific standards for policy provisions of Medicare supplement policies and certificates. The standards shall be in addition to and in accordance with applicable laws of this state. No requirement of the code relating to minimum required policy benefits, other than the minimum standards contained in this act, shall apply to Medicare supplement policies and certificates. The standards may cover, but are not limited to: (i) Terms of renewability; (ii) Initial and subsequent conditions of eligibility; (iii) Nonduplication of coverage; (iv) Probationary periods; (v) Benefit limitations, exceptions and reductions; (vi) Elimination periods; (vii) Requirements for replacement; (viii) Recurrent conditions; and (ix) Definitions of terms. (c) The commissioner shall adopt reasonable regulations that specify prohibited policy provisions not otherwise specifically authorized by statute which, in the opinion of the commissioner, are unjust, unfair or unfairly discriminatory to any person insured or proposed for coverage under a Medicare supplement policy or certificate. (d) Notwithstanding any other provision of law or contract, a Medicare supplement policy or certificate shall not exclude or limit benefits for losses incurred more than ninety (90) days from the effective date of coverage because the loss involved a preexisting condition. The policy or certificate shall not define a preexisting condition more restrictively than a condition for which medical advice was given or treatment was recommended by or received from a physician within ninety (90) days before the effective date of coverage.

Your change, as a redline

26-38-203. Standards for policy provisions.

(a) No Medicare supplement insurance policy or certificate in force in the state shall contain benefits which duplicate benefits provided by Medicare. (b) The commissioner shall adopt reasonable regulations to establish specific standards for policy provisions of Medicare supplement policies and certificates. The standards shall be in addition to and in accordance with applicable laws of this state. No requirement of the code relating to minimum required policy benefits, other than the minimum standards contained in this act, shall apply to Medicare supplement policies and certificates. The standards may cover, but are not limited to: (i) Terms of renewability; (ii) Initial and subsequent conditions of eligibility; (iii) Nonduplication of coverage; (iv) Probationary periods; (v) Benefit limitations, exceptions and reductions; (vi) Elimination periods; (vii) Requirements for replacement; (viii) Recurrent conditions; and (ix) Definitions of terms. (c) The commissioner shall adopt reasonable regulations that specify prohibited policy provisions not otherwise specifically authorized by statute which, in the opinion of the commissioner, are unjust, unfair or unfairly discriminatory to any person insured or proposed for coverage under a Medicare supplement policy or certificate. (d) Notwithstanding any other provision of law or contract, a Medicare supplement policy or certificate shall not exclude or limit benefits for losses incurred more than ninety (90) days from the effective date of coverage because the loss involved a preexisting condition. The policy or certificate shall not define a preexisting condition more restrictively than a condition for which medical advice was given or treatment was recommended by or received from a physician within ninety (90) days before the effective date of coverage.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it