Propose a change

Finance Act 1999

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

17 Penalties for incorrect certificates.

(1) For subsections (1) and (2) of section 62 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 (incorrect certificates as to zero-rating etc.) there shall be substituted the following subsections— (1) Subject to subsections (3) and (4) below, where— (a) a person to whom one or more supplies are, or are to be, made— (i) gives to the supplier a certificate that the supply or supplies fall, or will fall, wholly or partly within paragraph 1 of Schedule A1, Group 5 or 6 of Schedule 8 or Group 1 of Schedule 9, or (ii) gives to the supplier a certificate for the purposes of section 18B(2)(d) or 18C(1)(c), and (b) the certificate is incorrect, the person giving the certificate shall be liable to a penalty. (1A) Subject to subsections (3) and (4) below, where— (a) a person who makes, or is to make, an acquisition of goods from another member State prepares a certificate for the purposes of section 18B(1)(d), and (b) the certificate is incorrect, the person preparing the certificate shall be liable to a penalty. (2) The amount of the penalty shall be equal to— (a) in a case where the penalty is imposed by virtue of subsection (1) above, the difference between— (i) the amount of the VAT which would have been chargeable on the supply or supplies if the certificate had been correct; and (ii) the amount of VAT actually chargeable; (b) in a case where it is imposed by virtue of subsection (1A) above, the amount of VAT actually chargeable on the acquisition. (2) Subsection (1) above has effect in relation to certificates given or, as the case may be, prepared on or after the day on which this Act is passed.

Your change, as a redline

17 Penalties for incorrect certificates.

(1) For subsections (1) and (2) of section 62 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 (incorrect certificates as to zero-rating etc.) there shall be substituted the following subsections— (1) Subject to subsections (3) and (4) below, where— (a) a person to whom one or more supplies are, or are to be, made— (i) gives to the supplier a certificate that the supply or supplies fall, or will fall, wholly or partly within paragraph 1 of Schedule A1, Group 5 or 6 of Schedule 8 or Group 1 of Schedule 9, or (ii) gives to the supplier a certificate for the purposes of section 18B(2)(d) or 18C(1)(c), and (b) the certificate is incorrect, the person giving the certificate shall be liable to a penalty. (1A) Subject to subsections (3) and (4) below, where— (a) a person who makes, or is to make, an acquisition of goods from another member State prepares a certificate for the purposes of section 18B(1)(d), and (b) the certificate is incorrect, the person preparing the certificate shall be liable to a penalty. (2) The amount of the penalty shall be equal to— (a) in a case where the penalty is imposed by virtue of subsection (1) above, the difference between— (i) the amount of the VAT which would have been chargeable on the supply or supplies if the certificate had been correct; and (ii) the amount of VAT actually chargeable; (b) in a case where it is imposed by virtue of subsection (1A) above, the amount of VAT actually chargeable on the acquisition. (2) Subsection (1) above has effect in relation to certificates given or, as the case may be, prepared on or after the day on which this Act is passed.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds