Finance Act 1999
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
66 Qualifying corporate bonds: provision consequential on s. 65.
(1) This section applies where— (a) before 15th February 1999 there occurred a transaction (“the relevant transaction”) to which sections 127 to 130 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 applied; and (b) the new holding (within the meaning given by section 126 of that Act) consisted of or included something (“the new asset”) that— (i) did not fall to be treated as a qualifying corporate bond in relation to the relevant transaction, but (ii) by virtue of section 65 above, does fall to be so treated in relation to a disposal on or after 15th February 1999. (2) Section 116 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 (reorganisations etc. involving qualifying corporate bonds) shall have effect in relation to any disposal of the whole or part of the new asset on or after 15th February 1999 as if— (a) there had been a transaction (“the subsequent transaction”) by which the person holding the new asset had disposed of it and immediately re-acquired it; (b) the subsequent transaction had occurred at the time mentioned in subsection (3) below; (c) the asset re-acquired had been a qualifying corporate bond; and (d) the subsequent transaction had been a transaction to which section 127 of that Act would have applied but for section 116(5) of that Act. (3) That time is— (a) where the relevant transaction took place before 5th April 1996, that date; (b) where the relevant transaction took place on or after that date, immediately after the relevant transaction.
66 Qualifying corporate bonds: provision consequential on s. 65.
(1) This section applies where— (a) before 15th February 1999 there occurred a transaction (“the relevant transaction”) to which sections 127 to 130 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 applied; and (b) the new holding (within the meaning given by section 126 of that Act) consisted of or included something (“the new asset”) that— (i) did not fall to be treated as a qualifying corporate bond in relation to the relevant transaction, but (ii) by virtue of section 65 above, does fall to be so treated in relation to a disposal on or after 15th February 1999. (2) Section 116 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 (reorganisations etc. involving qualifying corporate bonds) shall have effect in relation to any disposal of the whole or part of the new asset on or after 15th February 1999 as if— (a) there had been a transaction (“the subsequent transaction”) by which the person holding the new asset had disposed of it and immediately re-acquired it; (b) the subsequent transaction had occurred at the time mentioned in subsection (3) below; (c) the asset re-acquired had been a qualifying corporate bond; and (d) the subsequent transaction had been a transaction to which section 127 of that Act would have applied but for section 116(5) of that Act. (3) That time is— (a) where the relevant transaction took place before 5th April 1996, that date; (b) where the relevant transaction took place on or after that date, immediately after the relevant transaction.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.