Bail Act 1976
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
SCHEDULE 3 REPEALS
Section 12. Chapter | Short Title | Extent of Repeal 31 Chas. 2. c. 2. | The Habeas Corpus Act 1679 | In section 5, the words “by recognizance”. 32 Geo. 3. c. 56. | The Servants’ Characters Act 1792 | In section 6, the words “and enter into recognizance”. 2 & 3 Vict. c. 47. | The Metropolitan Police Act 1839 | In section 69, the words from “to take bail” to the end. 2 & 3 Vict. c. 71. | The Metropolitan Police Courts Act 1839 | Section 36. 52 & 53 Vict. c. 63. | The Interpretation Act 1889. | In section 27, the words from “and shall include” to the end. 11 & 12 Geo. 6. c. 58. | The Criminal Justice Act 1948. | In section 37, subsections (2) and (3) and, in subsection (4), paragraph (a). 15 & 16 Geo 6. & 1 Eliz. 2. c. 55. | The Magistrates’ Courts Act 1952. | In section 16(2), the words “to enter into a recognizance or”. In section 26, subsection (4). Section 38(3). Section 97. 8 & 9 Eliz. 2. c. 65. | The Administration of Justice Act 1960. | In section 4(3), the words “the applicant or”. 1965 c. 45. | The Backing of Warrants (Republic of Ireland) Act 1965. | In section 5(4) the words “in breach of a recognizance takem from him under this section” and “without prejudice to the enforcement of the recognizance”. 1967 c. 80. | The Criminal Justice Act 1967. | Sections 18 and 21. In section 22(3), the reference to subsection (3) of section 37 of the Criminal Justice Act 1948. Section 23. 1969 c. 54. | The Children and Young Persons Act 1969. | In section 29, subsection (6). 1971 c. 23. | The Courts Act 1971. | In section 13, subsection (3). 1972 c. 71. | The Criminal Justice Act 1972. | Section 43.
SCHEDULE 3 REPEALS
Section 12. Chapter | Short Title | Extent of Repeal 31 Chas. 2. c. 2. | The Habeas Corpus Act 1679 | In section 5, the words “by recognizance”. 32 Geo. 3. c. 56. | The Servants’ Characters Act 1792 | In section 6, the words “and enter into recognizance”. 2 & 3 Vict. c. 47. | The Metropolitan Police Act 1839 | In section 69, the words from “to take bail” to the end. 2 & 3 Vict. c. 71. | The Metropolitan Police Courts Act 1839 | Section 36. 52 & 53 Vict. c. 63. | The Interpretation Act 1889. | In section 27, the words from “and shall include” to the end. 11 & 12 Geo. 6. c. 58. | The Criminal Justice Act 1948. | In section 37, subsections (2) and (3) and, in subsection (4), paragraph (a). 15 & 16 Geo 6. & 1 Eliz. 2. c. 55. | The Magistrates’ Courts Act 1952. | In section 16(2), the words “to enter into a recognizance or”. In section 26, subsection (4). Section 38(3). Section 97. 8 & 9 Eliz. 2. c. 65. | The Administration of Justice Act 1960. | In section 4(3), the words “the applicant or”. 1965 c. 45. | The Backing of Warrants (Republic of Ireland) Act 1965. | In section 5(4) the words “in breach of a recognizance takem from him under this section” and “without prejudice to the enforcement of the recognizance”. 1967 c. 80. | The Criminal Justice Act 1967. | Sections 18 and 21. In section 22(3), the reference to subsection (3) of section 37 of the Criminal Justice Act 1948. Section 23. 1969 c. 54. | The Children and Young Persons Act 1969. | In section 29, subsection (6). 1971 c. 23. | The Courts Act 1971. | In section 13, subsection (3). 1972 c. 71. | The Criminal Justice Act 1972. | Section 43.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.