Regulation (EEC) No 2842/72 of the Council of 19 December 1972 concluding an Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Iceland and adopting provisions for its implementation
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
Article 23
1. Without prejudice to Article 1 of Protocol No 2, no drawback or remission of any kind may be granted from customs duties in the Community or in Iceland in respect of products used in manufacture which do not originate in the Community, Iceland or the countries specified in Article 2 of this Protocol, as from the date on which the duty applicable to originating products of the same kind has been reduced in the Community and in Iceland to 40% of the basic duty. 2. Without prejudice to Article 1 of Protocol No 2, no drawback or remission of any kind may be granted from customs duties in Denmark, Norway or the United Kingdom in respect of products imported and used in the manufacture of goods for which a movement certificate is issued by the customs authorities of any of these three countries for the purpose of benefiting in Iceland from the tariff provisions in force in Iceland and covered by Article 3 (1) and Article 4 of the Agreement. This rule does not, however, apply where the products used are those referred to in Article 25 (1) of this Protocol. 3. Without prejudice to Article 1 of Protocol No 2, no drawback or remission of any kind may be granted from customs duties in Iceland in respect of imported products used in the manufacture of goods for which a movement certificate is issued by the customs authorities of Iceland for the purpose of benefiting in Denmark, Norway or the United Kingdom from the tariff provisions in force in these three countries and covered by Article 3 (1) and Article 4 of the Agreement. This rule does not, however, apply where the products used are those referred to in Article 25 (1) of this Protocol. 4. In this and the following articles, the term ‘customs duties’ also means charges having an effect equivalent to customs duties.
Article 23
1. Without prejudice to Article 1 of Protocol No 2, no drawback or remission of any kind may be granted from customs duties in the Community or in Iceland in respect of products used in manufacture which do not originate in the Community, Iceland or the countries specified in Article 2 of this Protocol, as from the date on which the duty applicable to originating products of the same kind has been reduced in the Community and in Iceland to 40% of the basic duty. 2. Without prejudice to Article 1 of Protocol No 2, no drawback or remission of any kind may be granted from customs duties in Denmark, Norway or the United Kingdom in respect of products imported and used in the manufacture of goods for which a movement certificate is issued by the customs authorities of any of these three countries for the purpose of benefiting in Iceland from the tariff provisions in force in Iceland and covered by Article 3 (1) and Article 4 of the Agreement. This rule does not, however, apply where the products used are those referred to in Article 25 (1) of this Protocol. 3. Without prejudice to Article 1 of Protocol No 2, no drawback or remission of any kind may be granted from customs duties in Iceland in respect of imported products used in the manufacture of goods for which a movement certificate is issued by the customs authorities of Iceland for the purpose of benefiting in Denmark, Norway or the United Kingdom from the tariff provisions in force in these three countries and covered by Article 3 (1) and Article 4 of the Agreement. This rule does not, however, apply where the products used are those referred to in Article 25 (1) of this Protocol. 4. In this and the following articles, the term ‘customs duties’ also means charges having an effect equivalent to customs duties.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.