Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
41 Role of admission forums
(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(7) In section 89 (procedure for determining admission arrangements) for subsection (10) substitute—
(10) In this section, “the appropriate bodies”, in relation to an admission authority, means—
(a) the bodies or persons whom they were required to consult under subsection (2), or would but for subsection (2A) have been required to consult, and
(b) in the case of an admission authority for a maintained school in England, the admission forum for the area of the local authority in which the school is situated.
(8) In section 90 (reference of objections to adjudicator or Secretary of State)—
(a) in subsection (1) for paragraph (b) substitute—
(b) an appropriate body wishes to make an objection about those arrangements, and
, and
(b) after subsection (10) insert—
(11) In this section, “appropriate body” means, in relation to the admission arrangements determined by an admission authority—
(a) any body or person whom the admission authority were required to consult under subsection (2) of section 89, or would but for subsection (2A) of that section have been required to consult, and
(b) in the case of admission arrangements determined by an admission authority for a maintained school in England, the admission forum for the area of the local authority in which the school is situated.
Your change, as a redline
41 Role of admission forums
(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(7) In section 89 (procedure for determining admission arrangements) for subsection (10) substitute—
(10) In this section, “the appropriate bodies”, in relation to an admission authority, means—
(a) the bodies or persons whom they were required to consult under subsection (2), or would but for subsection (2A) have been required to consult, and
(b) in the case of an admission authority for a maintained school in England, the admission forum for the area of the local authority in which the school is situated.
(8) In section 90 (reference of objections to adjudicator or Secretary of State)—
(a) in subsection (1) for paragraph (b) substitute—
(b) an appropriate body wishes to make an objection about those arrangements, and
, and
(b) after subsection (10) insert—
(11) In this section, “appropriate body” means, in relation to the admission arrangements determined by an admission authority—
(a) any body or person whom the admission authority were required to consult under subsection (2) of section 89, or would but for subsection (2A) of that section have been required to consult, and
(b) in the case of admission arrangements determined by an admission authority for a maintained school in England, the admission forum for the area of the local authority in which the school is situated.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.