Propose a change

Appropriation Act 1994 (repealed 24.7.1996)

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

SCHEDULE (B).—Part 1 Defence and Civil (Excesses), 1992–93

Defence and Civil (Excesses), 1992-93 SUMS granted, and sums which may be applied as appropriations in addition thereto, to make good excesses on certain grants for defence and civil services, for the year ended 31st March 1993, viz:— * Deficit Supply Grants | Surplus receipts available to be applied as Appropriations in Aid £ | £ Vote Class III 3 Agricultural support and animal health | 473,435.86 | 38,855.92 Class VIII 6 Royal palaces, Historic Royal Palaces Agency, royal parks, historic buildings, ancient monuments and the national heritage | 1,397,968.40 Class IX 3 Home Office administration, immigration and police support services, England and Wales For expenditure by the Home Office on police, the forensic science service, emergency planning, fire, the Fire Service College, the Football Licensing Authority, the Arson Prevention Bureau, court services, other services related to crime, probation and after-care, certain broadcasting services, data protection and other miscellaneous services, prevention of drug abuse, control of immigration and nationality, issue of passports etc., community services, and on administration (excluding prisons); and for payments to the Department of Employment (Class VI, Vote 1), the Department of National Heritage (Class XII, Votes 4 and 5) and the Department of Health (Class XIII, Vote 3) | 1,000.00 £ | £ Vote Class XIV 1 Central government administered social security benefits and other payments | 353,952,075.30 | *-15,942,876.36 Total, Defence and Civil (Excesses) 1992-93 | 355,824,479.56 | *-15,904,020.44

Your change, as a redline

SCHEDULE (B).—Part 1 Defence and Civil (Excesses), 1992–93

Defence and Civil (Excesses), 1992-93 SUMS granted, and sums which may be applied as appropriations in addition thereto, to make good excesses on certain grants for defence and civil services, for the year ended 31st March 1993, viz:— * Deficit Supply Grants | Surplus receipts available to be applied as Appropriations in Aid £ | £ Vote Class III 3 Agricultural support and animal health | 473,435.86 | 38,855.92 Class VIII 6 Royal palaces, Historic Royal Palaces Agency, royal parks, historic buildings, ancient monuments and the national heritage | 1,397,968.40 Class IX 3 Home Office administration, immigration and police support services, England and Wales For expenditure by the Home Office on police, the forensic science service, emergency planning, fire, the Fire Service College, the Football Licensing Authority, the Arson Prevention Bureau, court services, other services related to crime, probation and after-care, certain broadcasting services, data protection and other miscellaneous services, prevention of drug abuse, control of immigration and nationality, issue of passports etc., community services, and on administration (excluding prisons); and for payments to the Department of Employment (Class VI, Vote 1), the Department of National Heritage (Class XII, Votes 4 and 5) and the Department of Health (Class XIII, Vote 3) | 1,000.00 £ | £ Vote Class XIV 1 Central government administered social security benefits and other payments | 353,952,075.30 | *-15,942,876.36 Total, Defence and Civil (Excesses) 1992-93 | 355,824,479.56 | *-15,904,020.44

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds