Appropriation Act 1994 (repealed 24.7.1996)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
SCHEDULE (B).—Part 21 Class XIX
Class XIX 1994-95 SCHEDULE OF SUMS granted, and of the sums which may be applied as appropriations in aid in addition thereto, to defray the charges of the several Services herein particularly mentioned, which will come in course of payment during the year ending on 31st March 1995, viz.:— Sums not exceeding Supply Grants | Appropriations in Aid £ | £ Vote 1. For the expenditure by the Cabinet Office on administrative costs, the Offices of the Prime Minister, the Parliamentary Counsel and the Government Chief Whip, payments to the Chequers Trust and the British National Committee for the History of the Second World War, and certain other services (Including a Supplementary sum of £16,366,000) | 43,381,000 | 7,980,000 2. For expenditure by Her Majesty’s security and intelligence services on administration and operational costs, works and equipment, pensions and other payments | 881,486,000 | 2,128,000 3. For expenditure of the Department of Her Majesty’s Privy Council on administrative costs | 2,377,000 | 417,000 4. For the expenditure of the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration and the Health Service Commissioners for England, Scotland and Wales on administrative costs | 9,504,000 5. For expenditure of the House of Lords on Peers’ expenses and administrative costs, including staff pensions, security, stationery and printing | 26,324,000 6. For the expenditure by the House of Lords on works services; including a payment to the House of Commons in respect of administration | 15,488,000 | 503,000 7. For the expenditure of the House of Commons on Members’ salaries, allowances, pensions, etc, financial assistance to Opposition parties and an Exchequer contribution to the Members’ Fund | 71,666,000 Total, Class XIX | 1,050,226,000 | 11,028,000
SCHEDULE (B).—Part 21 Class XIX
Class XIX 1994-95 SCHEDULE OF SUMS granted, and of the sums which may be applied as appropriations in aid in addition thereto, to defray the charges of the several Services herein particularly mentioned, which will come in course of payment during the year ending on 31st March 1995, viz.:— Sums not exceeding Supply Grants | Appropriations in Aid £ | £ Vote 1. For the expenditure by the Cabinet Office on administrative costs, the Offices of the Prime Minister, the Parliamentary Counsel and the Government Chief Whip, payments to the Chequers Trust and the British National Committee for the History of the Second World War, and certain other services (Including a Supplementary sum of £16,366,000) | 43,381,000 | 7,980,000 2. For expenditure by Her Majesty’s security and intelligence services on administration and operational costs, works and equipment, pensions and other payments | 881,486,000 | 2,128,000 3. For expenditure of the Department of Her Majesty’s Privy Council on administrative costs | 2,377,000 | 417,000 4. For the expenditure of the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration and the Health Service Commissioners for England, Scotland and Wales on administrative costs | 9,504,000 5. For expenditure of the House of Lords on Peers’ expenses and administrative costs, including staff pensions, security, stationery and printing | 26,324,000 6. For the expenditure by the House of Lords on works services; including a payment to the House of Commons in respect of administration | 15,488,000 | 503,000 7. For the expenditure of the House of Commons on Members’ salaries, allowances, pensions, etc, financial assistance to Opposition parties and an Exchequer contribution to the Members’ Fund | 71,666,000 Total, Class XIX | 1,050,226,000 | 11,028,000
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.