Private Security Industry Act 2001
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
17 Imposition of requirements for approval
(1) The Secretary of State may by regulations provide that persons of prescribed descriptions are to be prohibited from providing prescribed security industry services unless they are for the time being approved in respect of those services in accordance with arrangements under section 15. (2) A person is guilty of an offence if he contravenes any prohibition imposed on him by regulations under subsection (1). (3) A person who— (a) is approved in respect of any security industry services in accordance with arrangements under section 15, and (b) would be prohibited by regulations under subsection (1) from providing those services except while for the time being so approved, is guilty of an offence if he contravenes any of the conditions of his approval in respect of those services. (4) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable— (a) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum; (b) on conviction on indictment, to a fine. (5) The Secretary of State may by regulations make provision in relation to cases in which a person is required by regulations under subsection (1) to be approved in respect of any services in accordance with arrangements under section 15— (a) for the conditions that are to be contained in his approval in relation to the handling of complaints made about the provision of those services; and (b) generally in relation to the arrangements under that section that are to be made for such cases.
17 Imposition of requirements for approval
(1) The Secretary of State may by regulations provide that persons of prescribed descriptions are to be prohibited from providing prescribed security industry services unless they are for the time being approved in respect of those services in accordance with arrangements under section 15. (2) A person is guilty of an offence if he contravenes any prohibition imposed on him by regulations under subsection (1). (3) A person who— (a) is approved in respect of any security industry services in accordance with arrangements under section 15, and (b) would be prohibited by regulations under subsection (1) from providing those services except while for the time being so approved, is guilty of an offence if he contravenes any of the conditions of his approval in respect of those services. (4) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable— (a) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum; (b) on conviction on indictment, to a fine. (5) The Secretary of State may by regulations make provision in relation to cases in which a person is required by regulations under subsection (1) to be approved in respect of any services in accordance with arrangements under section 15— (a) for the conditions that are to be contained in his approval in relation to the handling of complaints made about the provision of those services; and (b) generally in relation to the arrangements under that section that are to be made for such cases.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.