Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Act 2022
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
12 Duty to maintain records
(1) A manufacturer of a relevant connectable product must maintain a record of— (a) any investigations carried out by the manufacturer in relation to a compliance failure or suspected compliance failure (whether or not as a result of information received as mentioned in section 10(1)(a)); (b) any compliance failures relating to the product. (2) A record of an investigation must contain the following information— (a) the outcome of the investigation; (b) where the manufacturer determined that there was a compliance failure, details of that compliance failure; (c) any steps taken by the manufacturer to remedy the compliance failure and whether or not those steps were successful. (3) A record of a compliance failure must contain the following information— (a) details of the compliance failure; (b) any steps taken by the manufacturer to remedy the compliance failure and whether or not those steps were successful. (4) A record of an investigation or a compliance failure must be retained for a period of 10 years beginning with the day on which the record is made. (5) In a case where there is more than one manufacturer in relation to a product, the duty of each of those manufacturers to maintain a record under this section may be met by those manufacturers jointly maintaining a single record. (6) In this section “compliance failure” means a failure by a manufacturer of the product to comply with a relevant security requirement relating to the product.
12 Duty to maintain records
(1) A manufacturer of a relevant connectable product must maintain a record of— (a) any investigations carried out by the manufacturer in relation to a compliance failure or suspected compliance failure (whether or not as a result of information received as mentioned in section 10(1)(a)); (b) any compliance failures relating to the product. (2) A record of an investigation must contain the following information— (a) the outcome of the investigation; (b) where the manufacturer determined that there was a compliance failure, details of that compliance failure; (c) any steps taken by the manufacturer to remedy the compliance failure and whether or not those steps were successful. (3) A record of a compliance failure must contain the following information— (a) details of the compliance failure; (b) any steps taken by the manufacturer to remedy the compliance failure and whether or not those steps were successful. (4) A record of an investigation or a compliance failure must be retained for a period of 10 years beginning with the day on which the record is made. (5) In a case where there is more than one manufacturer in relation to a product, the duty of each of those manufacturers to maintain a record under this section may be met by those manufacturers jointly maintaining a single record. (6) In this section “compliance failure” means a failure by a manufacturer of the product to comply with a relevant security requirement relating to the product.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.