Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Act 2022
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
68 Arrangements pending determination of certain applications under code
(1) Paragraph 35 of the electronic communications code (arrangements pending determination of an application under paragraph 32 or 33) is amended as follows. (2) In sub-paragraph (2)— (a) at the end of paragraph (a) insert “or”, and (b) omit paragraph (c) (and the “or” preceding it). (3) After sub-paragraph (2) insert— (2A) The operator or the site provider may apply to the court for— (a) an order specifying the payments of consideration to be made by the operator to the site provider under the agreement relating to the existing code right until the application for an order under paragraph 32(1)(b) or 33(5) has been finally determined; (b) an order otherwise modifying the terms of that agreement until that time. (2B) An order under sub-paragraph (2A)(a) may provide for the order to have effect from the date of the application for the order. (4) In sub-paragraph (3), for “under sub-paragraph (2)(c)” substitute “referred to in sub-paragraph (2A)(a)”. (5) After sub-paragraph (3) insert— (4) In determining whether to make an order under sub-paragraph (2A)(b), the court must have regard to all the circumstances of the case, and in particular to— (a) the terms of the agreement relating to the existing code right, (b) the operator’s business and technical needs, (c) the use that the site provider is making of the land to which the agreement relates, (d) any duties imposed on the site provider by an enactment, and (e) the amount of consideration payable by the operator to the site provider under the agreement. (6) In the italic heading before paragraph 35, omit “for payment”.
68 Arrangements pending determination of certain applications under code
(1) Paragraph 35 of the electronic communications code (arrangements pending determination of an application under paragraph 32 or 33) is amended as follows. (2) In sub-paragraph (2)— (a) at the end of paragraph (a) insert “or”, and (b) omit paragraph (c) (and the “or” preceding it). (3) After sub-paragraph (2) insert— (2A) The operator or the site provider may apply to the court for— (a) an order specifying the payments of consideration to be made by the operator to the site provider under the agreement relating to the existing code right until the application for an order under paragraph 32(1)(b) or 33(5) has been finally determined; (b) an order otherwise modifying the terms of that agreement until that time. (2B) An order under sub-paragraph (2A)(a) may provide for the order to have effect from the date of the application for the order. (4) In sub-paragraph (3), for “under sub-paragraph (2)(c)” substitute “referred to in sub-paragraph (2A)(a)”. (5) After sub-paragraph (3) insert— (4) In determining whether to make an order under sub-paragraph (2A)(b), the court must have regard to all the circumstances of the case, and in particular to— (a) the terms of the agreement relating to the existing code right, (b) the operator’s business and technical needs, (c) the use that the site provider is making of the land to which the agreement relates, (d) any duties imposed on the site provider by an enactment, and (e) the amount of consideration payable by the operator to the site provider under the agreement. (6) In the italic heading before paragraph 35, omit “for payment”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.