The Representation of the People (Franchise Amendment and Eligibility Review) Regulations 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
6 Procedure for reviewing entitlement to registration – data-based review
(1) A registration officer appointed for an area in England must conduct a review in respect of a relevant person, to determine whether that person continues to satisfy the registration criteria. (2) As part of a review under paragraph (1), the registration officer may consider (amongst other things) any information provided in accordance with regulation 26(1)(fa) of the 2001 Regulations as part of an application received from a relevant person pursuant to section 10ZC(1)(a) of the 1983 Act.
6 Procedure for reviewing entitlement to registration – data-based review
(1) A registration officer appointed for an area in England must conduct a review in respect of a relevant person, to determine whether that person continues to satisfy the registration criteria. (2) As part of a review under paragraph (1), the registration officer may consider (amongst other things) any information provided in accordance with regulation 26(1)(fa) of the 2001 Regulations as part of an application received from a relevant person pursuant to section 10ZC(1)(a) of the 1983 Act.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.