Propose a change

Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

84 HMIC reports: publication

(1) Section 55 of the Police Act 1996 (publication of reports) is amended as follows. (2) For subsection (1) substitute— (1) The inspectors of constabulary must arrange for any report prepared under section 54 to be published in such manner as appears to the inspectors to be appropriate. . (3) For subsection (2) substitute— (2) But the inspectors of constabulary must exclude from publication under subsection (1) anything that the inspectors consider— (a) would be against the interests of national security, or (b) might jeopardise the safety of any person. (2A) The inspectors must disclose to the Secretary of State anything excluded from publication by virtue of subsection (2). . (4) For subsection (3) substitute— (3) The inspectors of constabulary must send a copy of the published report to— (a) the Secretary of State, (b) the local policing body maintaining the police force to which the report relates, (c) the chief officer of police of that police force, and (d) any police and crime panel established under section 28 of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 for the police area of that police force. . (5) In subsection (4)— (a) for “police authority” substitute “ local policing body ”, and (b) for “authority” substitute “ body ”. (6) In subsection (5)— (a) for “police authority” substitute “ local policing body ”, and (b) in paragraph (c) and in the words following that paragraph, for “authority” substitute “ body ”. (7) In subsection (6) for “police authority” substitute “ local policing body ”. (8) Omit subsection (8).

Your change, as a redline

84 HMIC reports: publication

(1) Section 55 of the Police Act 1996 (publication of reports) is amended as follows. (2) For subsection (1) substitute— (1) The inspectors of constabulary must arrange for any report prepared under section 54 to be published in such manner as appears to the inspectors to be appropriate. . (3) For subsection (2) substitute— (2) But the inspectors of constabulary must exclude from publication under subsection (1) anything that the inspectors consider— (a) would be against the interests of national security, or (b) might jeopardise the safety of any person. (2A) The inspectors must disclose to the Secretary of State anything excluded from publication by virtue of subsection (2). . (4) For subsection (3) substitute— (3) The inspectors of constabulary must send a copy of the published report to— (a) the Secretary of State, (b) the local policing body maintaining the police force to which the report relates, (c) the chief officer of police of that police force, and (d) any police and crime panel established under section 28 of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 for the police area of that police force. . (5) In subsection (4)— (a) for “police authority” substitute “ local policing body ”, and (b) for “authority” substitute “ body ”. (6) In subsection (5)— (a) for “police authority” substitute “ local policing body ”, and (b) in paragraph (c) and in the words following that paragraph, for “authority” substitute “ body ”. (7) In subsection (6) for “police authority” substitute “ local policing body ”. (8) Omit subsection (8).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds