Protection of Freedoms Act 2012
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
13 Destruction of copies
After section 63P of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (for which see section 12) insert— Destruction of copies of section 63D material 63Q (1) If fingerprints are required by section 63D to be destroyed, any copies of the fingerprints held by the police must also be destroyed. (2) If a DNA profile is required by that section to be destroyed, no copy may be retained by the police except in a form which does not include information which identifies the person to whom the DNA profile relates.
13 Destruction of copies
After section 63P of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (for which see section 12) insert— Destruction of copies of section 63D material 63Q (1) If fingerprints are required by section 63D to be destroyed, any copies of the fingerprints held by the police must also be destroyed. (2) If a DNA profile is required by that section to be destroyed, no copy may be retained by the police except in a form which does not include information which identifies the person to whom the DNA profile relates.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.