Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
39 Determination of section 37 application
(1) This section applies where an application is made, in accordance with section 37, to vary a premises licence so as to specify a new premises supervisor (“the proposed individual”).
(2) Subject to subsection (3), the relevant licensing authority must grant the application.
(3) Where a notice is given under section 37(5) (and not withdrawn), the authority must—
(a) hold a hearing to consider it, unless the authority, the applicant and the chief officer of police who gave the notice agree that a hearing is unnecessary, and
(b) having regard to the notice, reject the application if it considers it appropriate for the promotion of the crime prevention objective to do so.
(4) Where an application under section 37 is granted or rejected, the relevant licensing authority must give a notice to that effect to—
(a) the applicant,
(b) the proposed individual, and
(c) the chief officer of police for the police area (or each police area) in which the premises are situated.
(5) Where a chief officer of police gave a notice under subsection (5) of that section (and it was not withdrawn), the notice under subsection (4) of this section must state the authority’s reasons for granting or rejecting the application.
(6) Where the application is granted, the notice under subsection (4) must specify the time when the variation takes effect.
That time is the time specified in the application or, if that time is before the applicant is given that notice, such later time as the relevant licensing authority specifies in the notice.
Your change, as a redline
39 Determination of section 37 application
(1) This section applies where an application is made, in accordance with section 37, to vary a premises licence so as to specify a new premises supervisor (“the proposed individual”).
(2) Subject to subsection (3), the relevant licensing authority must grant the application.
(3) Where a notice is given under section 37(5) (and not withdrawn), the authority must—
(a) hold a hearing to consider it, unless the authority, the applicant and the chief officer of police who gave the notice agree that a hearing is unnecessary, and
(b) having regard to the notice, reject the application if it considers it appropriate for the promotion of the crime prevention objective to do so.
(4) Where an application under section 37 is granted or rejected, the relevant licensing authority must give a notice to that effect to—
(a) the applicant,
(b) the proposed individual, and
(c) the chief officer of police for the police area (or each police area) in which the premises are situated.
(5) Where a chief officer of police gave a notice under subsection (5) of that section (and it was not withdrawn), the notice under subsection (4) of this section must state the authority’s reasons for granting or rejecting the application.
(6) Where the application is granted, the notice under subsection (4) must specify the time when the variation takes effect.
That time is the time specified in the application or, if that time is before the applicant is given that notice, such later time as the relevant licensing authority specifies in the notice.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.