The Immigration Act 2014 (Bank Accounts) Regulations 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
30 The Tribunal
(1) Part 9 (hearings and appeals) of the 2000 Act applies with respect to proceedings pursuant to references to the Tribunal under these Regulations (“relevant proceedings”) as it applies to proceedings pursuant to references to the Tribunal under that Act, with the following modifications. (2) Section 133 (proceedings before the Tribunal: general provision) of the 2000 Act applies in relation to relevant proceedings as if— (a) references to decisions included references to decisions of the FCA only, and (b) any of the following decisions was a “disciplinary reference” within the meaning of subsection (7A)— (i) a decision to publish a statement under regulation 15 (public censure) or 16 (statement of misconduct), (ii) a decision to impose a penalty under regulation 17 (financial penalties), (iii) a decision to impose a restriction on a permission under regulation 18 (restrictions on permission to carry on regulated activities); (iv) a decision to impose a suspension of or restriction on an approval under regulation 19 (suspension of and restrictions on approval to carry on functions); (3) Section 133A (proceedings before Tribunal: decision and supervisory notices, etc.) of the 2000 Act applies as if— (a) for subsection (1) there were substituted— (1) In determining in accordance with section 133(5) (as applied by the Immigration Act 2014 (Financial Services) Regulations 2014) a reference made as a result of a decision notice given by the FCA, the Tribunal may not direct the FCA to take action which it would not, under the Immigration Act 2014 (Financial Services) Regulations 2014, have had power to take when giving the notice. ; and (b) in subsection (5) the words “or the PRA” were omitted; (4) Section 133B (offences) of the 2000 Act applies as if references to decisions included references to decisions of the FCA only.
30 The Tribunal
(1) Part 9 (hearings and appeals) of the 2000 Act applies with respect to proceedings pursuant to references to the Tribunal under these Regulations (“relevant proceedings”) as it applies to proceedings pursuant to references to the Tribunal under that Act, with the following modifications. (2) Section 133 (proceedings before the Tribunal: general provision) of the 2000 Act applies in relation to relevant proceedings as if— (a) references to decisions included references to decisions of the FCA only, and (b) any of the following decisions was a “disciplinary reference” within the meaning of subsection (7A)— (i) a decision to publish a statement under regulation 15 (public censure) or 16 (statement of misconduct), (ii) a decision to impose a penalty under regulation 17 (financial penalties), (iii) a decision to impose a restriction on a permission under regulation 18 (restrictions on permission to carry on regulated activities); (iv) a decision to impose a suspension of or restriction on an approval under regulation 19 (suspension of and restrictions on approval to carry on functions); (3) Section 133A (proceedings before Tribunal: decision and supervisory notices, etc.) of the 2000 Act applies as if— (a) for subsection (1) there were substituted— (1) In determining in accordance with section 133(5) (as applied by the Immigration Act 2014 (Financial Services) Regulations 2014) a reference made as a result of a decision notice given by the FCA, the Tribunal may not direct the FCA to take action which it would not, under the Immigration Act 2014 (Financial Services) Regulations 2014, have had power to take when giving the notice. ; and (b) in subsection (5) the words “or the PRA” were omitted; (4) Section 133B (offences) of the 2000 Act applies as if references to decisions included references to decisions of the FCA only.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.