Propose a change

Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

225 Pressure to impose union recognition requirement.

(1) An act is not protected if it constitutes, or is one of a number of acts which together constitute, an inducement or attempted inducement of a person— (a) to incorporate in a contract to which that person is a party, or a proposed contract to which he intends to be a party, a term or condition which is or would be void by virtue of section 186 (recognition requirement in contract for goods or services), or (b) to contravene section 187 (refusal to deal with person on grounds of union exclusion). (2) An act is not protected if— (a) it interferes with the supply (whether or not under a contract) of goods or services, or can reasonably be expected to have that effect, and (b) one of the facts relied upon for the purpose of establishing liability is that a person has— (i) induced another to break a contract of employment or interfered or induced another to interfere with its performance, or (ii) threatened that a contract of employment under which he or another is employed will be broken or its performance interfered with, or that he will induce another to break a contract of employment or to interfere with its performance, and (c) the reason, or one of the reasons, for doing the act is the fact or belief that the supplier (not being the employer under the contract of employment mentioned in paragraph (b)) does not, or might not— (i) recognise one or more trade unions for the purpose of negotiating on behalf of workers, or any class of worker, employed by him, or (ii) negotiate or consult with, or with an official of, one or more trade unions.

Your change, as a redline

225 Pressure to impose union recognition requirement.

(1) An act is not protected if it constitutes, or is one of a number of acts which together constitute, an inducement or attempted inducement of a person— (a) to incorporate in a contract to which that person is a party, or a proposed contract to which he intends to be a party, a term or condition which is or would be void by virtue of section 186 (recognition requirement in contract for goods or services), or (b) to contravene section 187 (refusal to deal with person on grounds of union exclusion). (2) An act is not protected if— (a) it interferes with the supply (whether or not under a contract) of goods or services, or can reasonably be expected to have that effect, and (b) one of the facts relied upon for the purpose of establishing liability is that a person has— (i) induced another to break a contract of employment or interfered or induced another to interfere with its performance, or (ii) threatened that a contract of employment under which he or another is employed will be broken or its performance interfered with, or that he will induce another to break a contract of employment or to interfere with its performance, and (c) the reason, or one of the reasons, for doing the act is the fact or belief that the supplier (not being the employer under the contract of employment mentioned in paragraph (b)) does not, or might not— (i) recognise one or more trade unions for the purpose of negotiating on behalf of workers, or any class of worker, employed by him, or (ii) negotiate or consult with, or with an official of, one or more trade unions.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds