Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
277 House of Lords staff.
(1) The provisions of this Act (except those specified below) apply in relation to employment as a relevant member of the House of Lords staff as in relation to other employment. (1A) The following provisions are excepted from subsection (1)— sections 184 and 185 (remedy for failure to comply with declaration as to disclosure of information), Chapter II of Part IV (procedure for handling redundancies). (2) Nothing in any rule of law or the law or practice of Parliament prevents a person from bringing a civil employment claim before the court or from bringing before an employment tribunal proceedings of any description . . . which could be brought before such a tribunal in relation to other employment. (2A) For the purposes of the application of the other provisions of this Act as they apply by virtue of this section— (a) the reference in section 182(1)(e) (disclosure of information for collective bargaining: restrictions) to a person’s undertaking shall be construed as a reference to the national interest or, if the case so requires, the interests of the House of Lords; and (b) any other reference to an undertaking shall be construed as a reference to the House of Lords. (3) In this section— relevant member of the House of Lords staff means any person who is employed under a contract of employment with the Corporate Officer of the House of Lords; civil employment claim means a claim arising out of or relating to a contract of employment or any other contract connected with employment, or a claim in tort arising in connection with a person’s employment; and the court means the High Court or the county court .
277 House of Lords staff.
(1) The provisions of this Act (except those specified below) apply in relation to employment as a relevant member of the House of Lords staff as in relation to other employment. (1A) The following provisions are excepted from subsection (1)— sections 184 and 185 (remedy for failure to comply with declaration as to disclosure of information), Chapter II of Part IV (procedure for handling redundancies). (2) Nothing in any rule of law or the law or practice of Parliament prevents a person from bringing a civil employment claim before the court or from bringing before an employment tribunal proceedings of any description . . . which could be brought before such a tribunal in relation to other employment. (2A) For the purposes of the application of the other provisions of this Act as they apply by virtue of this section— (a) the reference in section 182(1)(e) (disclosure of information for collective bargaining: restrictions) to a person’s undertaking shall be construed as a reference to the national interest or, if the case so requires, the interests of the House of Lords; and (b) any other reference to an undertaking shall be construed as a reference to the House of Lords. (3) In this section— relevant member of the House of Lords staff means any person who is employed under a contract of employment with the Corporate Officer of the House of Lords; civil employment claim means a claim arising out of or relating to a contract of employment or any other contract connected with employment, or a claim in tort arising in connection with a person’s employment; and the court means the High Court or the county court .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.