Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
29 Postponement of compilation of English rating lists to 2017
(1) Section 41 of the Local Government Finance Act 1988 (local rating lists) is amended in accordance with subsections (2) to (5). (2) In subsection (2) (list to be compiled on 1 April 1990 and every five years thereafter), at the end insert “ , subject to subsection (2A). ” (3) After that subsection insert— (2A) In the case of a billing authority in England— (a) subsection (2) does not require a list to be compiled on 1 April 2015 and on 1 April in every fifth year afterwards, and (b) a list must instead be compiled on 1 April 2017 and on 1 April in every fifth year afterwards. (4) In subsection (3) (list to remain in force until the next one is compiled five years later) omit “five years later”. (5) In subsection (7) (expiry of five year period not to detract from duty to maintain list) omit “five year”. (6) Section 52 of the Local Government Finance Act 1988 (central rating lists) is amended in accordance with subsections (7) to (10). (7) In subsection (2) (list to be compiled on 1 April 1990 and every five years thereafter), at the end insert “ , subject to subsection (2A). ” (8) After that subsection insert— (2A) In the application of this section to England— (a) subsection (2) does not require a list to be compiled on 1 April 2015 and on 1 April in every fifth year afterwards, and (b) a list must instead be compiled on 1 April 2017 and on 1 April in every fifth year afterwards. (9) In subsection (3) (list to remain in force until the next one is compiled five years later) omit “five years later”. (10) In subsection (7) (expiry of five year period not to detract from duty to maintain list) omit “five year”.
29 Postponement of compilation of English rating lists to 2017
(1) Section 41 of the Local Government Finance Act 1988 (local rating lists) is amended in accordance with subsections (2) to (5). (2) In subsection (2) (list to be compiled on 1 April 1990 and every five years thereafter), at the end insert “ , subject to subsection (2A). ” (3) After that subsection insert— (2A) In the case of a billing authority in England— (a) subsection (2) does not require a list to be compiled on 1 April 2015 and on 1 April in every fifth year afterwards, and (b) a list must instead be compiled on 1 April 2017 and on 1 April in every fifth year afterwards. (4) In subsection (3) (list to remain in force until the next one is compiled five years later) omit “five years later”. (5) In subsection (7) (expiry of five year period not to detract from duty to maintain list) omit “five year”. (6) Section 52 of the Local Government Finance Act 1988 (central rating lists) is amended in accordance with subsections (7) to (10). (7) In subsection (2) (list to be compiled on 1 April 1990 and every five years thereafter), at the end insert “ , subject to subsection (2A). ” (8) After that subsection insert— (2A) In the application of this section to England— (a) subsection (2) does not require a list to be compiled on 1 April 2015 and on 1 April in every fifth year afterwards, and (b) a list must instead be compiled on 1 April 2017 and on 1 April in every fifth year afterwards. (9) In subsection (3) (list to remain in force until the next one is compiled five years later) omit “five years later”. (10) In subsection (7) (expiry of five year period not to detract from duty to maintain list) omit “five year”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.