Propose a change

The Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 8) Rules 2014

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

10

In Part 45— (a) in rule 45.19— (i) in paragraph (2A)— (aa) for subparagraph (a) substitute— (a) obtaining the first report from an accredited medical expert selected via the MedCo Portal: £180; ; and (bb) in subparagraph (b), after “further report where justified from” insert “an expert from”; (ii) in paragraph (2B)— (aa) for “a report from a medical expert who—” substitute “a report to which paragraph (2A) applies where the medical expert—”; and (bb) in subparagraph (c), for “that they or an associate provide treatment” substitute “treatment that they or an associate then provide”; and (iii) for paragraph (2E) substitute— (2E) In this rule, ‘accredited medical expert’, ‘associate’, ‘associated with’, ‘fixed cost medical report’ ‘MedCo’ and ‘soft tissue injury claim’ have the same meaning as in paragraph 1.1(A1), (1A), (10A), (12A), and (16A), respectively, of the RTA Protocol. ; (b) in rule 45.20, for “36.21” substitute “36.29”; (c) in rule 45.24— (i) in subparagraph (2), for “Where a judgment is given” substitute “Subject to paragraph (2A), where a judgment is given”; and (ii) after paragraph (2)(c), insert— (2A) Where a judgment is given in favour of the claimant but the claimant did not comply with the process in paragraph 6.3A(2) of the RTA Protocol, the court may not order the defendant to pay the claimant’s costs and disbursements save in exceptional circumstances. ; (d) in rule 45.26, for “36.21” substitute “36.29”; and (e) in rule 45.29F— (i) in paragraph (8), for “36.10A” substitute “36.20”; and (ii) in paragraph (9), for “36.14A” substitute “36.21”; (f) in rule 45.29I— (i) in paragraph (2A)— (aa) for subparagraph (a) substitute— (a) obtaining the first report from an accredited medical expert selected via the MedCo Portal: £180; ; and (bb) in subparagraph (b), after “further report where justified from” insert “an expert from”; (ii) in paragraph (2B)— (aa) for “a report from a medical expert who—” substitute “a report to which paragraph (2A) applies where the medical expert—”; and (bb) in subparagraph (c), for “that they or an associate provide treatment” substitute “treatment that they or an associate then provide”; and (iii) for paragraph (2E) substitute— (2E) In this rule, ‘accredited medical expert’, ‘associate’, ‘associated with’, ‘fixed cost medical report’ ‘MedCo’ and ‘soft tissue injury claim’ have the same meaning as in paragraph 1.1(A1), (1A), (10A), (12A), and (16A), respectively, of the RTA Protocol. .

Your change, as a redline

10

In Part 45— (a) in rule 45.19— (i) in paragraph (2A)— (aa) for subparagraph (a) substitute— (a) obtaining the first report from an accredited medical expert selected via the MedCo Portal: £180; ; and (bb) in subparagraph (b), after “further report where justified from” insert “an expert from”; (ii) in paragraph (2B)— (aa) for “a report from a medical expert who—” substitute “a report to which paragraph (2A) applies where the medical expert—”; and (bb) in subparagraph (c), for “that they or an associate provide treatment” substitute “treatment that they or an associate then provide”; and (iii) for paragraph (2E) substitute— (2E) In this rule, ‘accredited medical expert’, ‘associate’, ‘associated with’, ‘fixed cost medical report’ ‘MedCo’ and ‘soft tissue injury claim’ have the same meaning as in paragraph 1.1(A1), (1A), (10A), (12A), and (16A), respectively, of the RTA Protocol. ; (b) in rule 45.20, for “36.21” substitute “36.29”; (c) in rule 45.24— (i) in subparagraph (2), for “Where a judgment is given” substitute “Subject to paragraph (2A), where a judgment is given”; and (ii) after paragraph (2)(c), insert— (2A) Where a judgment is given in favour of the claimant but the claimant did not comply with the process in paragraph 6.3A(2) of the RTA Protocol, the court may not order the defendant to pay the claimant’s costs and disbursements save in exceptional circumstances. ; (d) in rule 45.26, for “36.21” substitute “36.29”; and (e) in rule 45.29F— (i) in paragraph (8), for “36.10A” substitute “36.20”; and (ii) in paragraph (9), for “36.14A” substitute “36.21”; (f) in rule 45.29I— (i) in paragraph (2A)— (aa) for subparagraph (a) substitute— (a) obtaining the first report from an accredited medical expert selected via the MedCo Portal: £180; ; and (bb) in subparagraph (b), after “further report where justified from” insert “an expert from”; (ii) in paragraph (2B)— (aa) for “a report from a medical expert who—” substitute “a report to which paragraph (2A) applies where the medical expert—”; and (bb) in subparagraph (c), for “that they or an associate provide treatment” substitute “treatment that they or an associate then provide”; and (iii) for paragraph (2E) substitute— (2E) In this rule, ‘accredited medical expert’, ‘associate’, ‘associated with’, ‘fixed cost medical report’ ‘MedCo’ and ‘soft tissue injury claim’ have the same meaning as in paragraph 1.1(A1), (1A), (10A), (12A), and (16A), respectively, of the RTA Protocol. .

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds