Propose a change

Civil Partnership Act 2004

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

113 Civil partners: competency of interdict

(1) It shall not be incompetent for the Court of Session or the sheriff to entertain an application by one civil partner in a civil partnership for a relevant interdict by reason only that the civil partners are living together in civil partnership. (2) In subsection (1) . . . , “relevant interdict” means an interdict, including an interim interdict, which— (a) restrains or prohibits any conduct of one civil partner towards the other civil partner or a child of the family, or (b) subject to subsection (3), prohibits a civil partner from entering or remaining in— (i) a family home, (ii) any other residence occupied by the applicant civil partner, (iii) any place of work of the applicant civil partner, (iv) any school attended by a child in the permanent or temporary care of the applicant civil partner (3) Subsection (4) applies if in relation to a family home the non-applicant civil partner— (a) is an entitled partner, or (b) has occupancy rights. (4) Except where subsection (5) applies, the court may not grant a relevant interdict prohibiting the non-applicant civil partner from entering or remaining in the family home. (5) This subsection applies if— (a) the interdict is ancillary to an exclusion order, or (b) by virtue of section 101(4), the court refuses leave to exercise occupancy rights. (6) In this section . . . , “applicant civil partner” means the civil partner who has applied for the interdict; and “non-applicant civil partner” is to be construed accordingly.

Your change, as a redline

113 Civil partners: competency of interdict

(1) It shall not be incompetent for the Court of Session or the sheriff to entertain an application by one civil partner in a civil partnership for a relevant interdict by reason only that the civil partners are living together in civil partnership. (2) In subsection (1) . . . , “relevant interdict” means an interdict, including an interim interdict, which— (a) restrains or prohibits any conduct of one civil partner towards the other civil partner or a child of the family, or (b) subject to subsection (3), prohibits a civil partner from entering or remaining in— (i) a family home, (ii) any other residence occupied by the applicant civil partner, (iii) any place of work of the applicant civil partner, (iv) any school attended by a child in the permanent or temporary care of the applicant civil partner (3) Subsection (4) applies if in relation to a family home the non-applicant civil partner— (a) is an entitled partner, or (b) has occupancy rights. (4) Except where subsection (5) applies, the court may not grant a relevant interdict prohibiting the non-applicant civil partner from entering or remaining in the family home. (5) This subsection applies if— (a) the interdict is ancillary to an exclusion order, or (b) by virtue of section 101(4), the court refuses leave to exercise occupancy rights. (6) In this section . . . , “applicant civil partner” means the civil partner who has applied for the interdict; and “non-applicant civil partner” is to be construed accordingly.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds