Propose a change

Civil Partnership Act 2004

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

171 Refusal of dissolution in 5 year separation cases on ground of grave hardship

(1) The respondent to an application for a dissolution order in which the applicant alleges 5 years' separation may oppose the making of an order on the ground that— (a) the dissolution of the civil partnership will result in grave financial or other hardship to him, and (b) it would in all the circumstances be wrong to dissolve the civil partnership. (2) Subsection (3) applies if— (a) the making of a dissolution order is opposed under this section, (b) the court finds that the applicant is entitled to rely in support of his application on the fact of 5 years' separation and makes no such finding as to any other fact mentioned in section 168(5), and (c) apart from this section, the court would make a dissolution order. (3) The court must— (a) consider all the circumstances, including the conduct of the civil partners and the interests of the civil partners and of any children or other persons concerned, and (b) if it is of the opinion that the ground mentioned in subsection (1) is made out, dismiss the application for the dissolution order. (4) “Hardship” includes the loss of the chance of acquiring any benefit which the respondent might acquire if the civil partnership were not dissolved.

Your change, as a redline

171 Refusal of dissolution in 5 year separation cases on ground of grave hardship

(1) The respondent to an application for a dissolution order in which the applicant alleges 5 years' separation may oppose the making of an order on the ground that— (a) the dissolution of the civil partnership will result in grave financial or other hardship to him, and (b) it would in all the circumstances be wrong to dissolve the civil partnership. (2) Subsection (3) applies if— (a) the making of a dissolution order is opposed under this section, (b) the court finds that the applicant is entitled to rely in support of his application on the fact of 5 years' separation and makes no such finding as to any other fact mentioned in section 168(5), and (c) apart from this section, the court would make a dissolution order. (3) The court must— (a) consider all the circumstances, including the conduct of the civil partners and the interests of the civil partners and of any children or other persons concerned, and (b) if it is of the opinion that the ground mentioned in subsection (1) is made out, dismiss the application for the dissolution order. (4) “Hardship” includes the loss of the chance of acquiring any benefit which the respondent might acquire if the civil partnership were not dissolved.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds