Propose a change

Immigration Act 2014

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

18 Review of certain deportation decisions by Special Immigration Appeals Commission

In the Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997, after section 2D insert— Jurisdiction: review of certain deportation decisions 2E (1) Subsection (2) applies in relation to a relevant deportation decision which has been certified under section 97 or 97A(1) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (certification on grounds of national security etc). (2) The person to whom the decision relates may apply to the Special Immigration Appeals Commission to set aside the decision. (3) In determining whether the decision should be set aside, the Commission must apply the principles which would be applied in judicial review proceedings. (4) If the Commission decides that the decision should be set aside, it may make any such order, or give any such relief, as may be made or given in judicial review proceedings. (5) In this section “relevant deportation decision” means a decision of the Secretary of State about the deportation of a person from the United Kingdom, if and to the extent that— (a) the decision is not subject to a right of appeal, or (b) the decision (being subject to a right of appeal) gives rise to issues which may not be raised on such an appeal.

Your change, as a redline

18 Review of certain deportation decisions by Special Immigration Appeals Commission

In the Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997, after section 2D insert— Jurisdiction: review of certain deportation decisions 2E (1) Subsection (2) applies in relation to a relevant deportation decision which has been certified under section 97 or 97A(1) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (certification on grounds of national security etc). (2) The person to whom the decision relates may apply to the Special Immigration Appeals Commission to set aside the decision. (3) In determining whether the decision should be set aside, the Commission must apply the principles which would be applied in judicial review proceedings. (4) If the Commission decides that the decision should be set aside, it may make any such order, or give any such relief, as may be made or given in judicial review proceedings. (5) In this section “relevant deportation decision” means a decision of the Secretary of State about the deportation of a person from the United Kingdom, if and to the extent that— (a) the decision is not subject to a right of appeal, or (b) the decision (being subject to a right of appeal) gives rise to issues which may not be raised on such an appeal.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds