Propose a change

Insolvency Act 1986

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

197 Commission for receiving evidence.

(1) When a company is wound up in England and Wales or in Scotland, the court may refer the whole or any part of the examination of witnesses— (a) to the county court in England and Wales, or (b) to the sheriff principal for a specified sheriffdom in Scotland, or (c) to the High Court in Northern Ireland or a specified Northern Ireland County Court, (“specified” meaning specified in the order of the winding-up court). (2) Any person exercising jurisdiction as a judge of the court to which the reference is made (or, in Scotland, the sheriff principal to whom it is made) shall then, by virtue of this section, be a commissioner for the purpose of taking the evidence of those witnesses. (3) The judge or sheriff principal has in the matter referred the same power of summoning and examining witnesses, of requiring the production and delivery of documents, of punishing defaults by witnesses, and of allowing costs and expenses to witnesses, as the court which made the winding-up order. These powers are in addition to any which the judge or sheriff principal might lawfully exercise apart from this section. (4) The examination so taken shall be returned or reported to the court which made the order in such manner as that court requests. (5) This section extends to Northern Ireland.

Your change, as a redline

197 Commission for receiving evidence.

(1) When a company is wound up in England and Wales or in Scotland, the court may refer the whole or any part of the examination of witnesses— (a) to the county court in England and Wales, or (b) to the sheriff principal for a specified sheriffdom in Scotland, or (c) to the High Court in Northern Ireland or a specified Northern Ireland County Court, (“specified” meaning specified in the order of the winding-up court). (2) Any person exercising jurisdiction as a judge of the court to which the reference is made (or, in Scotland, the sheriff principal to whom it is made) shall then, by virtue of this section, be a commissioner for the purpose of taking the evidence of those witnesses. (3) The judge or sheriff principal has in the matter referred the same power of summoning and examining witnesses, of requiring the production and delivery of documents, of punishing defaults by witnesses, and of allowing costs and expenses to witnesses, as the court which made the winding-up order. These powers are in addition to any which the judge or sheriff principal might lawfully exercise apart from this section. (4) The examination so taken shall be returned or reported to the court which made the order in such manner as that court requests. (5) This section extends to Northern Ireland.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds