Propose a change

Insolvency Act 1986

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

251O False representations and omissions

(1) A person who makes an application for a debt relief order is guilty of an offence if he knowingly or recklessly makes any false representation or omission in making the application or providing any information or documents to the official receiver in support of the application. (2) A person who makes an application for a debt relief order is guilty of an offence if— (a) he intentionally fails to comply with a duty under section 251J(3) in connection with the application; or (b) he knowingly or recklessly makes any false representation or omission in providing any information to the official receiver in connection with such a duty or otherwise in connection with the application. (3) It is immaterial for the purposes of an offence under subsection (1) or (2) whether or not a debt relief order is made as a result of the application. (4) A person in respect of whom a debt relief order is made is guilty of an offence if— (a) he intentionally fails to comply with a duty under section 251J(5) in connection with the order; or (b) he knowingly or recklessly makes any false representation or omission in providing information to the official receiver in connection with such a duty or otherwise in connection with the performance by the official receiver of functions in relation to the order. (5) It is immaterial for the purposes of an offence under subsection (4)— (a) whether the offence is committed during or after the moratorium period; and (b) whether or not the order is revoked after the conduct constituting the offence takes place.

Your change, as a redline

251O False representations and omissions

(1) A person who makes an application for a debt relief order is guilty of an offence if he knowingly or recklessly makes any false representation or omission in making the application or providing any information or documents to the official receiver in support of the application. (2) A person who makes an application for a debt relief order is guilty of an offence if— (a) he intentionally fails to comply with a duty under section 251J(3) in connection with the application; or (b) he knowingly or recklessly makes any false representation or omission in providing any information to the official receiver in connection with such a duty or otherwise in connection with the application. (3) It is immaterial for the purposes of an offence under subsection (1) or (2) whether or not a debt relief order is made as a result of the application. (4) A person in respect of whom a debt relief order is made is guilty of an offence if— (a) he intentionally fails to comply with a duty under section 251J(5) in connection with the order; or (b) he knowingly or recklessly makes any false representation or omission in providing information to the official receiver in connection with such a duty or otherwise in connection with the performance by the official receiver of functions in relation to the order. (5) It is immaterial for the purposes of an offence under subsection (4)— (a) whether the offence is committed during or after the moratorium period; and (b) whether or not the order is revoked after the conduct constituting the offence takes place.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds