Propose a change

Insolvency Act 1986

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

251Q Fraudulent disposal of property

(1) A person in respect of whom a debt relief order is made is guilty of an offence if he made or caused to be made any gift or transfer of his property during the period between— (a) the start of the period of two years ending with the application date; and (b) the end of the moratorium period. (2) The reference in subsection (1) to making a transfer of any property includes causing or conniving at the levying of any execution against that property. (3) A person is not guilty of an offence under this section if he proves that, in respect of the conduct constituting the offence, he had no intent to defraud or to conceal the state of his affairs. (4) For the purposes of subsection (3) a person is to be taken to have proved that he had no such intent if— (a) sufficient evidence is adduced to raise an issue as to whether he had such intent; and (b) the contrary is not proved beyond reasonable doubt. (5) It is immaterial for the purposes of this section whether or not the debt relief order in question is revoked after the conduct constituting an offence takes place (but no offence is committed by virtue of conduct occurring after the order is revoked).

Your change, as a redline

251Q Fraudulent disposal of property

(1) A person in respect of whom a debt relief order is made is guilty of an offence if he made or caused to be made any gift or transfer of his property during the period between— (a) the start of the period of two years ending with the application date; and (b) the end of the moratorium period. (2) The reference in subsection (1) to making a transfer of any property includes causing or conniving at the levying of any execution against that property. (3) A person is not guilty of an offence under this section if he proves that, in respect of the conduct constituting the offence, he had no intent to defraud or to conceal the state of his affairs. (4) For the purposes of subsection (3) a person is to be taken to have proved that he had no such intent if— (a) sufficient evidence is adduced to raise an issue as to whether he had such intent; and (b) the contrary is not proved beyond reasonable doubt. (5) It is immaterial for the purposes of this section whether or not the debt relief order in question is revoked after the conduct constituting an offence takes place (but no offence is committed by virtue of conduct occurring after the order is revoked).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds