Propose a change

Insolvency Act 1986

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

251S Obtaining credit or engaging in business

(1) A person in respect of whom a debt relief order is made is guilty of an offence if, during the relevant period— (a) he obtains credit (either alone or jointly with any other person) without giving the person from whom he obtains the credit the relevant information about his status; or (b) he engages directly or indirectly in any business under a name other than that in which the order was made without disclosing to all persons with whom he enters into any business transaction the name in which the order was made. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1)(a) the relevant information about a person's status is the information that— (a) a moratorium is in force in relation to the debt relief order, (b) a debt relief restrictions order is in force in respect of him, or (c) both a moratorium and a debt relief restrictions order is in force, as the case may be. (3) In subsection (1) “relevant period” means— (a) the moratorium period relating to the debt relief order, or (b) the period for which a debt relief restrictions order is in force in respect of the person in respect of whom the debt relief order is made, as the case may be. (4) Subsection (1)(a) does not apply if the amount of the credit is less than the prescribed amount (if any). (5) The reference in subsection (1)(a) to a person obtaining credit includes the following cases— (a) where goods are bailed to him under a hire-purchase agreement, or agreed to be sold to him under a conditional sale agreement; (b) where he is paid in advance (in money or otherwise) for the supply of goods or services.

Your change, as a redline

251S Obtaining credit or engaging in business

(1) A person in respect of whom a debt relief order is made is guilty of an offence if, during the relevant period— (a) he obtains credit (either alone or jointly with any other person) without giving the person from whom he obtains the credit the relevant information about his status; or (b) he engages directly or indirectly in any business under a name other than that in which the order was made without disclosing to all persons with whom he enters into any business transaction the name in which the order was made. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1)(a) the relevant information about a person's status is the information that— (a) a moratorium is in force in relation to the debt relief order, (b) a debt relief restrictions order is in force in respect of him, or (c) both a moratorium and a debt relief restrictions order is in force, as the case may be. (3) In subsection (1) “relevant period” means— (a) the moratorium period relating to the debt relief order, or (b) the period for which a debt relief restrictions order is in force in respect of the person in respect of whom the debt relief order is made, as the case may be. (4) Subsection (1)(a) does not apply if the amount of the credit is less than the prescribed amount (if any). (5) The reference in subsection (1)(a) to a person obtaining credit includes the following cases— (a) where goods are bailed to him under a hire-purchase agreement, or agreed to be sold to him under a conditional sale agreement; (b) where he is paid in advance (in money or otherwise) for the supply of goods or services.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds