Propose a change

Insolvency Act 1986

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

373 Jurisdiction in relation to insolvent individuals.

(1) The High Court and the county court have jurisdiction throughout England and Wales for the purposes of the Parts in this Group. (2) For the purposes of those Parts, the county court has, in addition to its ordinary jurisdiction, all the powers and jurisdiction of the High Court; and the orders of the court may be enforced accordingly in the prescribed manner. (3) Jurisdiction for the purposes of those Parts is exercised— (a) by the High Court or the county court in relation to the proceedings, which, in accordance with the rules, are allocated to the London insolvency district, and (b) by the county court in relation to the proceedings which are so allocated to any other insolvency district. (4) Subsection (3) is without prejudice to the transfer of proceedings from one court to another in the manner prescribed by the rules; and nothing in that subsection invalidates any proceedings on the grounds that they were initiated or continued in the wrong court.

Your change, as a redline

373 Jurisdiction in relation to insolvent individuals.

(1) The High Court and the county court have jurisdiction throughout England and Wales for the purposes of the Parts in this Group. (2) For the purposes of those Parts, the county court has, in addition to its ordinary jurisdiction, all the powers and jurisdiction of the High Court; and the orders of the court may be enforced accordingly in the prescribed manner. (3) Jurisdiction for the purposes of those Parts is exercised— (a) by the High Court or the county court in relation to the proceedings, which, in accordance with the rules, are allocated to the London insolvency district, and (b) by the county court in relation to the proceedings which are so allocated to any other insolvency district. (4) Subsection (3) is without prejudice to the transfer of proceedings from one court to another in the manner prescribed by the rules; and nothing in that subsection invalidates any proceedings on the grounds that they were initiated or continued in the wrong court.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds