Propose a change

Insolvency Act 1986

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

391D Directions

(1) This section applies if the Secretary of State is satisfied that an act or omission of a recognised professional body (or a series of such acts or omissions) in discharging one or more of its regulatory functions has had, or is likely to have, an adverse impact on the achievement of one or more of the regulatory objectives. (2) The Secretary of State may, if in all the circumstances of the case satisfied that it is appropriate to do so, direct the body to take such steps as the Secretary of State considers will counter the adverse impact, mitigate its effect or prevent its occurrence or recurrence. (3) A direction under this section may require a recognised professional body— (a) to take only such steps as it has power to take under its regulatory arrangements; (b) to take steps with a view to the modification of any part of its regulatory arrangements. (4) A direction under this section may require a recognised professional body— (a) to take steps with a view to the institution of, or otherwise in respect of, specific regulatory proceedings; (b) to take steps in respect of all, or a specified class of, such proceedings. (5) For the purposes of this section, a direction to take steps includes a direction which requires a recognised professional body to refrain from taking a particular course of action. (6) In this section “regulatory arrangements”, in relation to a recognised professional body, means the arrangements that the body has for or in connection with— (a) authorising persons to act as insolvency practitioners, or (b) regulating persons acting as insolvency practitioners.

Your change, as a redline

391D Directions

(1) This section applies if the Secretary of State is satisfied that an act or omission of a recognised professional body (or a series of such acts or omissions) in discharging one or more of its regulatory functions has had, or is likely to have, an adverse impact on the achievement of one or more of the regulatory objectives. (2) The Secretary of State may, if in all the circumstances of the case satisfied that it is appropriate to do so, direct the body to take such steps as the Secretary of State considers will counter the adverse impact, mitigate its effect or prevent its occurrence or recurrence. (3) A direction under this section may require a recognised professional body— (a) to take only such steps as it has power to take under its regulatory arrangements; (b) to take steps with a view to the modification of any part of its regulatory arrangements. (4) A direction under this section may require a recognised professional body— (a) to take steps with a view to the institution of, or otherwise in respect of, specific regulatory proceedings; (b) to take steps in respect of all, or a specified class of, such proceedings. (5) For the purposes of this section, a direction to take steps includes a direction which requires a recognised professional body to refrain from taking a particular course of action. (6) In this section “regulatory arrangements”, in relation to a recognised professional body, means the arrangements that the body has for or in connection with— (a) authorising persons to act as insolvency practitioners, or (b) regulating persons acting as insolvency practitioners.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds