Propose a change

Insolvency Act 1986

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

A13 Extension by court on application of directors

(1) At any time after the first 15 business days of the initial period, the directors may apply to the court for an order that the moratorium be extended. (2) The application must be accompanied by— (a) a statement from the directors that all of the following that have fallen due have been paid or otherwise discharged— (i) moratorium debts, and (ii) pre-moratorium debts for which the company does not have a payment holiday during the moratorium (see section A18), (b) a statement from the directors that, in their view, the company is, or is likely to become, unable to pay its pre-moratorium debts, (c) a statement from the directors as to whether pre-moratorium creditors (as defined by section A12(4) and (5)) have been consulted about the application and if not why not, and (d) a statement from the monitor that, in the monitor’s view, it is likely that the moratorium will result in the rescue of the company as a going concern. (3) The rules may make provision about the date on which a statement mentioned in subsection (2) must be made. (4) On hearing the application the court may— (a) make an order that the moratorium be extended to such date as is specified in the order, or (b) make any other order which the court thinks appropriate. (5) In deciding whether to make an order under subsection (4)(a) the court must, in particular, consider the following— (a) the interests of pre-moratorium creditors, as defined by section A12(4) and (5), and (b) the likelihood that the extension of the moratorium will result in the rescue of the company as a going concern. (6) Subsection (7) applies where— (a) an application under this section is made, and (b) apart from that subsection, the moratorium would end at a time before the application has been disposed of. (7) The moratorium— (a) does not end at the time mentioned in subsection (6)(b), and (b) instead, ends— (i) in a case in which the court makes an order under subsection (4)(a), in accordance with the order; (ii) otherwise, when the application is withdrawn or disposed of. (8) A moratorium may be extended under this section more than once.

Your change, as a redline

A13 Extension by court on application of directors

(1) At any time after the first 15 business days of the initial period, the directors may apply to the court for an order that the moratorium be extended. (2) The application must be accompanied by— (a) a statement from the directors that all of the following that have fallen due have been paid or otherwise discharged— (i) moratorium debts, and (ii) pre-moratorium debts for which the company does not have a payment holiday during the moratorium (see section A18), (b) a statement from the directors that, in their view, the company is, or is likely to become, unable to pay its pre-moratorium debts, (c) a statement from the directors as to whether pre-moratorium creditors (as defined by section A12(4) and (5)) have been consulted about the application and if not why not, and (d) a statement from the monitor that, in the monitor’s view, it is likely that the moratorium will result in the rescue of the company as a going concern. (3) The rules may make provision about the date on which a statement mentioned in subsection (2) must be made. (4) On hearing the application the court may— (a) make an order that the moratorium be extended to such date as is specified in the order, or (b) make any other order which the court thinks appropriate. (5) In deciding whether to make an order under subsection (4)(a) the court must, in particular, consider the following— (a) the interests of pre-moratorium creditors, as defined by section A12(4) and (5), and (b) the likelihood that the extension of the moratorium will result in the rescue of the company as a going concern. (6) Subsection (7) applies where— (a) an application under this section is made, and (b) apart from that subsection, the moratorium would end at a time before the application has been disposed of. (7) The moratorium— (a) does not end at the time mentioned in subsection (6)(b), and (b) instead, ends— (i) in a case in which the court makes an order under subsection (4)(a), in accordance with the order; (ii) otherwise, when the application is withdrawn or disposed of. (8) A moratorium may be extended under this section more than once.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds