Propose a change

Insolvency Act 1986

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

A44 Challenge to directors’ actions

(1) A creditor or member of a company may apply to the court for an order under this section on the ground that— (a) during a moratorium, the company’s affairs, business and property are being or have been managed by the directors in a manner which has unfairly harmed the interests of its creditors or members generally or of some part of its creditors or members (including at least the applicant), or (b) any actual or proposed act or omission of the directors during a moratorium causes or would cause such harm. (2) An application under subsection (1) may be made during the moratorium or after it has ended. (3) On an application under subsection (1) the court may make such order as it thinks fit. (4) An order under subsection (3) may in particular— (a) regulate the management by the directors of the company’s affairs, business and property during the remainder of the moratorium, (b) require the directors to refrain from doing or continuing an act complained of by the applicant or to do an act which the applicant has complained they have omitted to do, (c) require a decision of the company’s creditors to be sought (using a qualifying decision procedure) on such matters as the court may direct, or (d) bring the moratorium to an end and make such consequential provision as the court thinks fit. (5) In making an order under subsection (3) the court must have regard to the need to safeguard the interests of persons who have dealt with the company in good faith and for value. (6) See also section A17 (obligations to notify change in end of moratorium).

Your change, as a redline

A44 Challenge to directors’ actions

(1) A creditor or member of a company may apply to the court for an order under this section on the ground that— (a) during a moratorium, the company’s affairs, business and property are being or have been managed by the directors in a manner which has unfairly harmed the interests of its creditors or members generally or of some part of its creditors or members (including at least the applicant), or (b) any actual or proposed act or omission of the directors during a moratorium causes or would cause such harm. (2) An application under subsection (1) may be made during the moratorium or after it has ended. (3) On an application under subsection (1) the court may make such order as it thinks fit. (4) An order under subsection (3) may in particular— (a) regulate the management by the directors of the company’s affairs, business and property during the remainder of the moratorium, (b) require the directors to refrain from doing or continuing an act complained of by the applicant or to do an act which the applicant has complained they have omitted to do, (c) require a decision of the company’s creditors to be sought (using a qualifying decision procedure) on such matters as the court may direct, or (d) bring the moratorium to an end and make such consequential provision as the court thinks fit. (5) In making an order under subsection (3) the court must have regard to the need to safeguard the interests of persons who have dealt with the company in good faith and for value. (6) See also section A17 (obligations to notify change in end of moratorium).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds