Propose a change

Merchant Shipping Act 1995

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

269 Re-hearing of and appeal from investigations.

(1) Where a formal investigation has been held under section 268 the Secretary of State may order the whole or part of the case to be re-heard, and shall do so— (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) if there appear to the Secretary of State to be ... grounds for suspecting that a miscarriage of justice may have occurred. (2) An order under subsection (1) above may provide for the re-hearing to be as follows— (a) if the investigation was held in England, Wales or Northern Ireland, by a wreck commissioner or by the High Court; (b) if it was held in Scotland, by the sheriff or by the Court of Session. (3) Any re-hearing under this section which is not held by the High Court or the Court of Session shall be conducted in accordance with rules made under section 270(1); and section 268 shall apply in relation to a re-hearing of an investigation by a wreck commissioner or sheriff as it applies in relation to the holding of an investigation. (4) Where the wreck commissioner or sheriff holding the investigation has decided to cancel or suspend the certificate of any person or has found any person at fault, then, if no application for an order under subsection (1) above has been made or such an application has been refused, that person or any other person who, having an interest in the investigation, has appeared at the hearing and is affected by the decision or finding, may appeal— (a) to the High Court if the investigation was held in England, Wales or Northern Ireland; (b) to the Court of Session if it was held in Scotland. (5) Section 268(7) applies for the purposes of this section as it applies for the purposes of that section.

Your change, as a redline

269 Re-hearing of and appeal from investigations.

(1) Where a formal investigation has been held under section 268 the Secretary of State may order the whole or part of the case to be re-heard, and shall do so— (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) if there appear to the Secretary of State to be ... grounds for suspecting that a miscarriage of justice may have occurred. (2) An order under subsection (1) above may provide for the re-hearing to be as follows— (a) if the investigation was held in England, Wales or Northern Ireland, by a wreck commissioner or by the High Court; (b) if it was held in Scotland, by the sheriff or by the Court of Session. (3) Any re-hearing under this section which is not held by the High Court or the Court of Session shall be conducted in accordance with rules made under section 270(1); and section 268 shall apply in relation to a re-hearing of an investigation by a wreck commissioner or sheriff as it applies in relation to the holding of an investigation. (4) Where the wreck commissioner or sheriff holding the investigation has decided to cancel or suspend the certificate of any person or has found any person at fault, then, if no application for an order under subsection (1) above has been made or such an application has been refused, that person or any other person who, having an interest in the investigation, has appeared at the hearing and is affected by the decision or finding, may appeal— (a) to the High Court if the investigation was held in England, Wales or Northern Ireland; (b) to the Court of Session if it was held in Scotland. (5) Section 268(7) applies for the purposes of this section as it applies for the purposes of that section.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds