Propose a change

Merchant Shipping Act 1995

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

92 Duty of ship to assist the other in case of collision.

(1) In every case of collision between two ships, it shall be the duty of the master of each ship, if and so far as he can do so without danger to his own ship, crew and passengers (if any)— (a) to render to the other ship, its master, crew and passengers (if any) such assistance as may be practicable, and may be necessary to save them from any danger caused by the collision, and to stay by the other ship until he has ascertained that it has no need of further assistance; and (b) to give to the master of the other ship the name of his own ship and also the names of the ports from which it comes and to which it is bound. (2) The duties imposed on the master of a ship by subsection (1) above apply to the masters of United Kingdom ships and to the masters of foreign ships when in United Kingdom waters. (3) The failure of the master of a ship to comply with the provisions of this section shall not raise any presumption of law that the collision was caused by his wrongful act, neglect, or default. (4) If the master fails without reasonable excuse to comply with this section, he shall— (a) in the case of a failure to comply with subsection (1)(a) above, be liable— (i) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding £50,000 a fine or imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or both; (ii) on conviction on indictment, to a fine or imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or both; and (b) in the case of a failure to comply with subsection (1)(b) above, be liable— (i) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum; (ii) on conviction on indictment, to a fine; and in either case if he is a certified officer, an inquiry into his conduct may be held, and his certificate cancelled or suspended.

Your change, as a redline

92 Duty of ship to assist the other in case of collision.

(1) In every case of collision between two ships, it shall be the duty of the master of each ship, if and so far as he can do so without danger to his own ship, crew and passengers (if any)— (a) to render to the other ship, its master, crew and passengers (if any) such assistance as may be practicable, and may be necessary to save them from any danger caused by the collision, and to stay by the other ship until he has ascertained that it has no need of further assistance; and (b) to give to the master of the other ship the name of his own ship and also the names of the ports from which it comes and to which it is bound. (2) The duties imposed on the master of a ship by subsection (1) above apply to the masters of United Kingdom ships and to the masters of foreign ships when in United Kingdom waters. (3) The failure of the master of a ship to comply with the provisions of this section shall not raise any presumption of law that the collision was caused by his wrongful act, neglect, or default. (4) If the master fails without reasonable excuse to comply with this section, he shall— (a) in the case of a failure to comply with subsection (1)(a) above, be liable— (i) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding £50,000 a fine or imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or both; (ii) on conviction on indictment, to a fine or imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or both; and (b) in the case of a failure to comply with subsection (1)(b) above, be liable— (i) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum; (ii) on conviction on indictment, to a fine; and in either case if he is a certified officer, an inquiry into his conduct may be held, and his certificate cancelled or suspended.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds