The Coasting Schools (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
3 Amendment to regulation 4
For regulation 4 (Coasting schools), substitute— 4 (1) A school is coasting for the purposes of section 60B(1) of the Education and Inspections Act 2006 where— (a) the school meets the entry conditions in paragraph (2), (3), (4) or (5); and (b) following any inspections which cause the school to meet the entry conditions in paragraph (2), (3), (4) or (5), the school has not met the exit condition. (2) The entry conditions in this paragraph are that— (a) in a section 5 inspection, the school was awarded a grade of “needs attention” by the Chief Inspector in the evaluation area of leadership and governance; and (b) the Chief Inspector made a relevant assessment— (i) in the school’s previous section 5 inspection; or (ii) if the school has not had a previous section 5 inspection, in the most recent section 5 inspection of a linked school. (3) The entry conditions in this paragraph are that in a section 5 inspection report the Chief Inspector— (a) made a statement required under section 13(4) or section 13(5) of the Education Act 2005; (b) did not make a statement required under section 13(3)(b) of the Education Act 2005; and (c) awarded the school— (i) a grade of “needs attention” in any evaluation area applicable to the school; (ii) if the section 5 inspection occurred on or after 2nd September 2024, a grade of “requires improvement” in the key judgement of quality of education or leadership and management; or (iii) if the section 5 inspection occurred before 2nd September 2024, a grade of “satisfactory” or “requires improvement” for the school’s overall effectiveness. (4) The entry conditions in this paragraph are that— (a) in a section 5 inspection that occurred on or after 2nd September 2024, the school was awarded a grade of “requires improvement” by the Chief Inspector in the key judgement of quality of education or leadership and management; and (b) the Chief Inspector made a relevant assessment— (i) in the school’s previous section 5 inspection; or (ii) if the school has not had a previous section 5 inspection, in the most recent section 5 inspection of a linked school. (5) The entry conditions in this paragraph are that— (a) in a section 5 inspection that occurred before 2nd September 2024, the school was awarded a grade of “requires improvement” by the Chief Inspector for overall effectiveness; and (b) the Chief Inspector made a relevant assessment— (i) in the school’s previous section 5 inspection; or (ii) if the school has not had a previous section 5 inspection, in the most recent section 5 inspection of a linked school. (6) In this regulation the exit condition is met if— (a) in a section 5 inspection or section 8 inspection of the school the Chief Inspector awarded none of the following grades in any evaluation area applicable to the school— (i) “needs attention”; (ii) “urgent improvement”; (iii) “not met”; (b) in a section 5 inspection that occurred on or after 2nd September 2024, the Chief Inspector awarded a grade of “outstanding” or “good” in the key judgements of quality of education and leadership and management; or (c) in a section 5 inspection that occurred before 2nd September 2024, the Chief Inspector awarded a grade of “outstanding” or “good” for the school’s overall effectiveness. (7) In this regulation a “relevant assessment” is— (a) a statement required under section 13(3)(b) of the Education Act 2005; (b) a grade of “needs attention” in the evaluation area of leadership and governance; (c) in a section 5 inspection that occurred on or after 2nd September 2024, a grade of “requires improvement” in the key judgement of quality of education or leadership and management; or (d) in a section 5 inspection that occurred before 2nd September 2024, a grade of “satisfactory” or “requires improvement” for the school’s overall effectiveness. (8) In this regulation a “linked school” is, in relation to a school (“School A”)— (a) its predecessor school; (b) if there are two or more predecessor schools, each predecessor school; or (c) if School A has only one predecessor school and that school has not had a section 5 inspection, the most recent school in a chain with School A to receive a section 5 inspection. (9) In paragraph (8)— (a) a “predecessor school” is a school that— (i) has been discontinued; and (ii) upon discontinuation was replaced by School A; (b) a “school in a chain with School A” means any of the schools which are part of a sequence of schools which were discontinued and replaced by another school where the last school in the sequence is School A. (10) In this regulation— (a) a “section 5 inspection” means an inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. (b) a “section 8 inspection” means an inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. .
3 Amendment to regulation 4
For regulation 4 (Coasting schools), substitute— 4 (1) A school is coasting for the purposes of section 60B(1) of the Education and Inspections Act 2006 where— (a) the school meets the entry conditions in paragraph (2), (3), (4) or (5); and (b) following any inspections which cause the school to meet the entry conditions in paragraph (2), (3), (4) or (5), the school has not met the exit condition. (2) The entry conditions in this paragraph are that— (a) in a section 5 inspection, the school was awarded a grade of “needs attention” by the Chief Inspector in the evaluation area of leadership and governance; and (b) the Chief Inspector made a relevant assessment— (i) in the school’s previous section 5 inspection; or (ii) if the school has not had a previous section 5 inspection, in the most recent section 5 inspection of a linked school. (3) The entry conditions in this paragraph are that in a section 5 inspection report the Chief Inspector— (a) made a statement required under section 13(4) or section 13(5) of the Education Act 2005; (b) did not make a statement required under section 13(3)(b) of the Education Act 2005; and (c) awarded the school— (i) a grade of “needs attention” in any evaluation area applicable to the school; (ii) if the section 5 inspection occurred on or after 2nd September 2024, a grade of “requires improvement” in the key judgement of quality of education or leadership and management; or (iii) if the section 5 inspection occurred before 2nd September 2024, a grade of “satisfactory” or “requires improvement” for the school’s overall effectiveness. (4) The entry conditions in this paragraph are that— (a) in a section 5 inspection that occurred on or after 2nd September 2024, the school was awarded a grade of “requires improvement” by the Chief Inspector in the key judgement of quality of education or leadership and management; and (b) the Chief Inspector made a relevant assessment— (i) in the school’s previous section 5 inspection; or (ii) if the school has not had a previous section 5 inspection, in the most recent section 5 inspection of a linked school. (5) The entry conditions in this paragraph are that— (a) in a section 5 inspection that occurred before 2nd September 2024, the school was awarded a grade of “requires improvement” by the Chief Inspector for overall effectiveness; and (b) the Chief Inspector made a relevant assessment— (i) in the school’s previous section 5 inspection; or (ii) if the school has not had a previous section 5 inspection, in the most recent section 5 inspection of a linked school. (6) In this regulation the exit condition is met if— (a) in a section 5 inspection or section 8 inspection of the school the Chief Inspector awarded none of the following grades in any evaluation area applicable to the school— (i) “needs attention”; (ii) “urgent improvement”; (iii) “not met”; (b) in a section 5 inspection that occurred on or after 2nd September 2024, the Chief Inspector awarded a grade of “outstanding” or “good” in the key judgements of quality of education and leadership and management; or (c) in a section 5 inspection that occurred before 2nd September 2024, the Chief Inspector awarded a grade of “outstanding” or “good” for the school’s overall effectiveness. (7) In this regulation a “relevant assessment” is— (a) a statement required under section 13(3)(b) of the Education Act 2005; (b) a grade of “needs attention” in the evaluation area of leadership and governance; (c) in a section 5 inspection that occurred on or after 2nd September 2024, a grade of “requires improvement” in the key judgement of quality of education or leadership and management; or (d) in a section 5 inspection that occurred before 2nd September 2024, a grade of “satisfactory” or “requires improvement” for the school’s overall effectiveness. (8) In this regulation a “linked school” is, in relation to a school (“School A”)— (a) its predecessor school; (b) if there are two or more predecessor schools, each predecessor school; or (c) if School A has only one predecessor school and that school has not had a section 5 inspection, the most recent school in a chain with School A to receive a section 5 inspection. (9) In paragraph (8)— (a) a “predecessor school” is a school that— (i) has been discontinued; and (ii) upon discontinuation was replaced by School A; (b) a “school in a chain with School A” means any of the schools which are part of a sequence of schools which were discontinued and replaced by another school where the last school in the sequence is School A. (10) In this regulation— (a) a “section 5 inspection” means an inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. (b) a “section 8 inspection” means an inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.