The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (External Investigations) Order 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
31 Statements
(1) A statement made by a financial institution in response to an account monitoring order may not be used in evidence against it in criminal proceedings. (2) But paragraph (1) does not apply— (a) in the case of proceedings under Part 2 or 4 of the Act, (b) in the case of proceedings for contempt of court, or (c) on a prosecution for an offence where, in giving evidence, the financial institution makes a statement inconsistent with the statement mentioned in paragraph (1). (3) A statement may not be used by virtue of paragraph (2)(c) against a financial institution unless— (a) evidence relating to it is adduced, or (b) a question relating to it is asked, by or on behalf of the financial institution in the proceedings arising out of the prosecution.
31 Statements
(1) A statement made by a financial institution in response to an account monitoring order may not be used in evidence against it in criminal proceedings. (2) But paragraph (1) does not apply— (a) in the case of proceedings under Part 2 or 4 of the Act, (b) in the case of proceedings for contempt of court, or (c) on a prosecution for an offence where, in giving evidence, the financial institution makes a statement inconsistent with the statement mentioned in paragraph (1). (3) A statement may not be used by virtue of paragraph (2)(c) against a financial institution unless— (a) evidence relating to it is adduced, or (b) a question relating to it is asked, by or on behalf of the financial institution in the proceedings arising out of the prosecution.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.