The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (External Investigations) Order 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
34B Requirements for making of unexplained wealth order
(1) These are the requirements for the making of an unexplained wealth order in respect of any property. (2) The High Court must be satisfied that there is reasonable cause to believe that— (a) the respondent holds the property, and (b) the value of the property is greater than that of the sum for the time being specified in section 362B(2)(b) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (requirements for making of unexplained wealth order). (3) The High Court must be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that— (a) the known sources of the respondent’s lawfully obtained income would have been insufficient for the purposes of enabling the respondent to obtain the property, or (b) the property has been obtained through unlawful conduct (within the meaning given by section 242 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002). (4) The High Court must be satisfied that— (a) the respondent is a politically exposed person, or (b) there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that— (i) the respondent is, or has been, involved in serious crime (whether in a part of the United Kingdom or elsewhere), or (ii) a person connected with the respondent is, or has been, so involved. (5) It does not matter for the purposes of paragraph (2)(a)— (a) whether or not there are other persons who also hold the property; (b) whether the property was obtained by the respondent before or after the coming into force of this article. (6) For the purposes of paragraph (3)— (a) regard is to be had to any mortgage, charge or other kind of security that it is reasonable to assume was or may have been available to the respondent for the purpose of obtaining the property; (b) it is to be assumed that the respondent obtained the property for a price equivalent to its market value; (c) income is “lawfully obtained” if it is obtained lawfully under the laws of the country from where the income arises; (d) “known” sources of the respondent’s income are the sources of income (whether arising from employment, assets or otherwise) that are reasonably ascertainable from available information at the time of the making of the application for the order; (e) where the property is an interest in other property comprised in a settlement, the reference to the respondent obtaining property is to be taken as if it were a reference to the respondent obtaining direct ownership of such share in the settled property as relates to, or is fairly represented by that interest. (7) In paragraph (4)(a), “politically exposed person” has the same meaning as for the time being specified in section 362B of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. (8) For the purposes of this article— (a) a person is involved in serious crime in a part of the United Kingdom or elsewhere if the person would be so involved for the purposes of Part 1 of the Serious Crime Act 2007 (see in particular sections 2, 2A and 3 of that Act) ...; (b) section 1122 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 (“connected” persons) applies in determining whether a person is connected with another. (9) Where the property in respect of which the order is sought comprises more than one item of property, the reference in paragraph (2)(b) to the value of the property is to the total value of those items.
34B Requirements for making of unexplained wealth order
(1) These are the requirements for the making of an unexplained wealth order in respect of any property. (2) The High Court must be satisfied that there is reasonable cause to believe that— (a) the respondent holds the property, and (b) the value of the property is greater than that of the sum for the time being specified in section 362B(2)(b) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (requirements for making of unexplained wealth order). (3) The High Court must be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that— (a) the known sources of the respondent’s lawfully obtained income would have been insufficient for the purposes of enabling the respondent to obtain the property, or (b) the property has been obtained through unlawful conduct (within the meaning given by section 242 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002). (4) The High Court must be satisfied that— (a) the respondent is a politically exposed person, or (b) there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that— (i) the respondent is, or has been, involved in serious crime (whether in a part of the United Kingdom or elsewhere), or (ii) a person connected with the respondent is, or has been, so involved. (5) It does not matter for the purposes of paragraph (2)(a)— (a) whether or not there are other persons who also hold the property; (b) whether the property was obtained by the respondent before or after the coming into force of this article. (6) For the purposes of paragraph (3)— (a) regard is to be had to any mortgage, charge or other kind of security that it is reasonable to assume was or may have been available to the respondent for the purpose of obtaining the property; (b) it is to be assumed that the respondent obtained the property for a price equivalent to its market value; (c) income is “lawfully obtained” if it is obtained lawfully under the laws of the country from where the income arises; (d) “known” sources of the respondent’s income are the sources of income (whether arising from employment, assets or otherwise) that are reasonably ascertainable from available information at the time of the making of the application for the order; (e) where the property is an interest in other property comprised in a settlement, the reference to the respondent obtaining property is to be taken as if it were a reference to the respondent obtaining direct ownership of such share in the settled property as relates to, or is fairly represented by that interest. (7) In paragraph (4)(a), “politically exposed person” has the same meaning as for the time being specified in section 362B of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. (8) For the purposes of this article— (a) a person is involved in serious crime in a part of the United Kingdom or elsewhere if the person would be so involved for the purposes of Part 1 of the Serious Crime Act 2007 (see in particular sections 2, 2A and 3 of that Act) ...; (b) section 1122 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 (“connected” persons) applies in determining whether a person is connected with another. (9) Where the property in respect of which the order is sought comprises more than one item of property, the reference in paragraph (2)(b) to the value of the property is to the total value of those items.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.