The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (External Investigations) Order 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
34C Non-compliance with an unexplained wealth order
(1) This article applies in a case where the respondent and the specified responsible officer (if any), between them, fail, without reasonable excuse, to comply with the requirements imposed by an unexplained wealth order in respect of any property before the end of the response period. (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1) where an unexplained wealth order imposes more than one requirement on the respondent, the respondent and the specified responsible officer (if any) are to be taken to have failed to comply with the requirements imposed by the order unless each of the requirements is complied with or is purported to be complied with. (3) In the event of a failure by the respondent or the specified responsible officer (if any) to comply with the requirements of an unexplained wealth order, the enforcement authority that applied for the order must inform the Secretary of State of that failure and whether an interim freezing order has effect in relation to the property (see article 34H (unexplained wealth order: application for interim freezing order)). (4) The Secretary of State must— (a) inform the requesting party of the non-compliance with the unexplained wealth order, and (b) if an interim freezing order has effect in relation to the property, inform the requesting party that the interim freezing order will cease to have effect on the expiry of 28 days beginning with the day after the day with which the response period ends. (5) In this article— “requesting party” means the overseas authority that requested assistance with the external investigation in question; “response period” means the period specified by the court in accordance with article 34A(7) (period specified for complying with the order).
34C Non-compliance with an unexplained wealth order
(1) This article applies in a case where the respondent and the specified responsible officer (if any), between them, fail, without reasonable excuse, to comply with the requirements imposed by an unexplained wealth order in respect of any property before the end of the response period. (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1) where an unexplained wealth order imposes more than one requirement on the respondent, the respondent and the specified responsible officer (if any) are to be taken to have failed to comply with the requirements imposed by the order unless each of the requirements is complied with or is purported to be complied with. (3) In the event of a failure by the respondent or the specified responsible officer (if any) to comply with the requirements of an unexplained wealth order, the enforcement authority that applied for the order must inform the Secretary of State of that failure and whether an interim freezing order has effect in relation to the property (see article 34H (unexplained wealth order: application for interim freezing order)). (4) The Secretary of State must— (a) inform the requesting party of the non-compliance with the unexplained wealth order, and (b) if an interim freezing order has effect in relation to the property, inform the requesting party that the interim freezing order will cease to have effect on the expiry of 28 days beginning with the day after the day with which the response period ends. (5) In this article— “requesting party” means the overseas authority that requested assistance with the external investigation in question; “response period” means the period specified by the court in accordance with article 34A(7) (period specified for complying with the order).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.