Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1799/79 of 13 August 1979 amending Regulations (EEC) No 1391/78 and (EEC) No 2962/78 concerning the rules for the application of the system of premiums for the non-marketing of milk and milk products and for the conversion of dairy herds
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
Article 1
Regulation (EEC) No 1391/78 is hereby amended as follows: 1. Article 12 shall be replaced by the following: ‘Article 12 1. Where, by reason of a case of force majeure occurring after the day on which the application for a premium has been approved, the beneficiary or his successor referred to in Article 9 (2) is unable, or would be able only at the cost of excessive sacrifices, to fulfil an obligation arising from the system of premiums, the Member State concerned shall determine the measures which it shall deem necessary with regard to the circumstances invoked. Such measures may, according to the case, entail postponing the beginning of the non-marketing or conversion period referred to in Article 5 (3) or the suspension of the obligations for a specific length of time during that period and the non-recovery of the premiums already paid, which would have to be refunded in accordance with Article 9 (1). 2. Without prejudice to specific circumstances to be taken into consideration in individual cases, the following situations in particular may be deemed to justify one of the measures referred to in paragraph 1: (a) decease of the beneficiary if he ran the holding himself; (b) prolonged occupational incapacity of the beneficiary if he ran the holding himself; (c) compulsory purchase of a substantial part of the utilized agricultural area of the holding farmed by the beneficiary, provided that such compulsory purchase was not foreseeable on the day on which the application was approved; (d) a natural disaster substantially affecting the agricultural area farmed by the beneficiary; (e) the accidental destruction of the beneficiary's buildings which were used for the rearing of cattle or sheep; (f) an outbreak of epizootic disease affecting some or all of the beneficiary's stock of cattle or sheep. 3. The Member States shall inform the Commission of all cases of force majeure accepted as such by them. 4. By way of derogation from Article 9 (1), in a case which cannot be deemed a case of force majeure and in which the beneficiary of the conversion premium no longer fulfils, during the fourth year of the conversion period, the undertaking referred to in Article 3 (2) (c) of Regulation (EEC) No 1078/77, the amount of the premium to be recovered or, if the balance has still not been paid to him, the amount to be withheld shall be equal to 25 % of the total amount of the premium to which he would have been entitled, this percentage being reduced in proportion to the difference between the number of livestock units kept and the required number of livestock units. 2. The following Article 12a shall be inserted: ‘Article 12a 1. Before the end of the third year of the conversion period, each recipient of the conversion premium may declare in writing to the competent authority that he wishes to be considered as a recipient of the non-marketing premium, by accepting the conditions referred to in Article 2 and Article 4 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1078/77. 2. In such cases, the competent authority shall make the necessary adjustments to the approval initially issued and in particular shall adjust the non-marketing period and the amounts of the premium still not paid, on the basis of the situation which would have existed if the interested party had applied for the non-marketing premium from the beginning.’ 3. The following paragraph shall be added to Article 15: ‘The provision contained in Article 8 (5) shall apply, at the request of interested parties, to the identity cards issued pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 1307/77.’
Article 1
Regulation (EEC) No 1391/78 is hereby amended as follows: 1. Article 12 shall be replaced by the following: ‘Article 12 1. Where, by reason of a case of force majeure occurring after the day on which the application for a premium has been approved, the beneficiary or his successor referred to in Article 9 (2) is unable, or would be able only at the cost of excessive sacrifices, to fulfil an obligation arising from the system of premiums, the Member State concerned shall determine the measures which it shall deem necessary with regard to the circumstances invoked. Such measures may, according to the case, entail postponing the beginning of the non-marketing or conversion period referred to in Article 5 (3) or the suspension of the obligations for a specific length of time during that period and the non-recovery of the premiums already paid, which would have to be refunded in accordance with Article 9 (1). 2. Without prejudice to specific circumstances to be taken into consideration in individual cases, the following situations in particular may be deemed to justify one of the measures referred to in paragraph 1: (a) decease of the beneficiary if he ran the holding himself; (b) prolonged occupational incapacity of the beneficiary if he ran the holding himself; (c) compulsory purchase of a substantial part of the utilized agricultural area of the holding farmed by the beneficiary, provided that such compulsory purchase was not foreseeable on the day on which the application was approved; (d) a natural disaster substantially affecting the agricultural area farmed by the beneficiary; (e) the accidental destruction of the beneficiary's buildings which were used for the rearing of cattle or sheep; (f) an outbreak of epizootic disease affecting some or all of the beneficiary's stock of cattle or sheep. 3. The Member States shall inform the Commission of all cases of force majeure accepted as such by them. 4. By way of derogation from Article 9 (1), in a case which cannot be deemed a case of force majeure and in which the beneficiary of the conversion premium no longer fulfils, during the fourth year of the conversion period, the undertaking referred to in Article 3 (2) (c) of Regulation (EEC) No 1078/77, the amount of the premium to be recovered or, if the balance has still not been paid to him, the amount to be withheld shall be equal to 25 % of the total amount of the premium to which he would have been entitled, this percentage being reduced in proportion to the difference between the number of livestock units kept and the required number of livestock units. 2. The following Article 12a shall be inserted: ‘Article 12a 1. Before the end of the third year of the conversion period, each recipient of the conversion premium may declare in writing to the competent authority that he wishes to be considered as a recipient of the non-marketing premium, by accepting the conditions referred to in Article 2 and Article 4 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1078/77. 2. In such cases, the competent authority shall make the necessary adjustments to the approval initially issued and in particular shall adjust the non-marketing period and the amounts of the premium still not paid, on the basis of the situation which would have existed if the interested party had applied for the non-marketing premium from the beginning.’ 3. The following paragraph shall be added to Article 15: ‘The provision contained in Article 8 (5) shall apply, at the request of interested parties, to the identity cards issued pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 1307/77.’
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.