Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
69 Investigations by the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales.
(1) The Public Services Ombudsman for Wales may investigate—
(a) cases in which a written allegation is made to him by any person that a member or co-opted member (or former member or co-opted member) of a relevant authority ... has failed, or may have failed, to comply with the authority’s code of conduct, and
(b) other cases in which he considers that a member or co-opted member (or former member or co-opted member) of a relevant authority ... has failed, or may have failed, to comply with the authority’s code of conduct and which have come to his attention as a result of an investigation under paragraph (a).
(2) If the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales considers that a written allegation under subsection (1)(a) should not be investigated, he must take reasonable steps to give written notification to the person who made the allegation of the decision and the reasons for the decision.
(3) The purpose of an investigation under this section is to determine which of the findings mentioned in subsection (4) is appropriate.
(4) Those findings are—
(a) that there is no evidence of any failure to comply with the code of conduct of the relevant authority concerned,
(b) that no action needs to be taken in respect of the matters which are the subject of the investigation,
(c) that the matters which are the subject of the investigation should be referred to the monitoring officer of the relevant authority concerned, or
(d) that the matters which are the subject of the investigation should be referred to the president of the Adjudication Panel for Wales for adjudication by a tribunal falling within section 76(1).
(5) Where a person is no longer a member or co-opted member of the relevant authority concerned but is a member or co-opted member of another relevant authority ..., the reference in subsection (4)(c) to the monitoring officer of the relevant authority concerned is to be treated as a reference either to the monitoring officer of the relevant authority concerned or to the monitoring officer of that other relevant authority (and accordingly if the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales reaches a finding under subsection (4)(c) he must decide to which of those monitoring officers to refer the matters concerned).
(6) Sections 69A to 69E apply in relation to the exercise of the functions of the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales under this section.
Your change, as a redline
69 Investigations by the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales.
(1) The Public Services Ombudsman for Wales may investigate—
(a) cases in which a written allegation is made to him by any person that a member or co-opted member (or former member or co-opted member) of a relevant authority ... has failed, or may have failed, to comply with the authority’s code of conduct, and
(b) other cases in which he considers that a member or co-opted member (or former member or co-opted member) of a relevant authority ... has failed, or may have failed, to comply with the authority’s code of conduct and which have come to his attention as a result of an investigation under paragraph (a).
(2) If the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales considers that a written allegation under subsection (1)(a) should not be investigated, he must take reasonable steps to give written notification to the person who made the allegation of the decision and the reasons for the decision.
(3) The purpose of an investigation under this section is to determine which of the findings mentioned in subsection (4) is appropriate.
(4) Those findings are—
(a) that there is no evidence of any failure to comply with the code of conduct of the relevant authority concerned,
(b) that no action needs to be taken in respect of the matters which are the subject of the investigation,
(c) that the matters which are the subject of the investigation should be referred to the monitoring officer of the relevant authority concerned, or
(d) that the matters which are the subject of the investigation should be referred to the president of the Adjudication Panel for Wales for adjudication by a tribunal falling within section 76(1).
(5) Where a person is no longer a member or co-opted member of the relevant authority concerned but is a member or co-opted member of another relevant authority ..., the reference in subsection (4)(c) to the monitoring officer of the relevant authority concerned is to be treated as a reference either to the monitoring officer of the relevant authority concerned or to the monitoring officer of that other relevant authority (and accordingly if the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales reaches a finding under subsection (4)(c) he must decide to which of those monitoring officers to refer the matters concerned).
(6) Sections 69A to 69E apply in relation to the exercise of the functions of the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales under this section.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.