Architects Act 1997
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
26 Consequential amendments.
In— (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) section 52(1) of the Cathedrals Measure 1963, in the definition of “architect”; and (c) section 20(1) of the Care of Cathedrals Measure 1990, in the definition of “architect”, for “Architects Acts 1931 to 1996” substitute “ Architects Act 1997 ”.
26 Consequential amendments.
In— (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) section 52(1) of the Cathedrals Measure 1963, in the definition of “architect”; and (c) section 20(1) of the Care of Cathedrals Measure 1990, in the definition of “architect”, for “Architects Acts 1931 to 1996” substitute “ Architects Act 1997 ”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.