Arbitration Act 1979 (repealed 31.1.1997)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
4 Exclusion agreements not to apply in certain cases.
(1) Subject to subsection (3) below, if an arbitration award or a question of law arising in the course of a reference relates, in whole or in part, to— (a) a question or claim falling within the Admiralty jurisdiction of the High Court, or (b) a dispute arising out of a contract of insurance, or (c) a dispute arising out of a commodity contract, an exclusion agreement shall have no effect in relation to the award or question unless either— (i) the exclusion agreement is entered into after the commencement of the arbitration in which the award is made or, as the case may be, in which the question of law arises, or (ii) the award or question relates to a contract which is expressed to be governed by a law other than the law of England and Wales. (2) In subsection (1)(c) above “commodity contract” means a contract— (a) for the sale of goods regularly dealt with on a commodity market or exchange in England or Wales which is specified for the purposes of this section by an order made by the Secretary of State; and (b) of a description so specified. (3) The Secretary of State may by order provide that subsection (1) above— (a) shall cease to have effect; or (b) subject to such conditions as may be specified in the order, shall not apply to any exclusion agreement made in relation to an arbitration award of a description so specified; and an order under this subsection may contain such supplementary, incidental and transitional provisions as appear to the Secretary of State to be necessary or expedient. (4) The power to make an order under subsection (2) or subsection (3) above shall be exercisable by statutory instrument which shall be subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament. (5) In this section “exclusion agreement” has the same meaning as in section 3 above.
4 Exclusion agreements not to apply in certain cases.
(1) Subject to subsection (3) below, if an arbitration award or a question of law arising in the course of a reference relates, in whole or in part, to— (a) a question or claim falling within the Admiralty jurisdiction of the High Court, or (b) a dispute arising out of a contract of insurance, or (c) a dispute arising out of a commodity contract, an exclusion agreement shall have no effect in relation to the award or question unless either— (i) the exclusion agreement is entered into after the commencement of the arbitration in which the award is made or, as the case may be, in which the question of law arises, or (ii) the award or question relates to a contract which is expressed to be governed by a law other than the law of England and Wales. (2) In subsection (1)(c) above “commodity contract” means a contract— (a) for the sale of goods regularly dealt with on a commodity market or exchange in England or Wales which is specified for the purposes of this section by an order made by the Secretary of State; and (b) of a description so specified. (3) The Secretary of State may by order provide that subsection (1) above— (a) shall cease to have effect; or (b) subject to such conditions as may be specified in the order, shall not apply to any exclusion agreement made in relation to an arbitration award of a description so specified; and an order under this subsection may contain such supplementary, incidental and transitional provisions as appear to the Secretary of State to be necessary or expedient. (4) The power to make an order under subsection (2) or subsection (3) above shall be exercisable by statutory instrument which shall be subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament. (5) In this section “exclusion agreement” has the same meaning as in section 3 above.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.