Propose a change

Finance Act 2014

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

159A Play using the results of successful freeplay

(1) Where a chargeable person participates in remote gaming, an amount is not to be taken into account in determining the “gaming payment” (if any) under section 159 so far as the amount is paid out of money in relation to which the first and second conditions are met (“excluded winnings”). (2) The first condition is that the money has been won by participation in the gaming either— (a) in reliance on an offer which waives all or part of a gaming payment, or (b) in a case where the gaming payment was paid out of money in relation to which this condition and the second condition were met. (3) The second condition is that the chargeable person is not entitled to use the money otherwise than for the purpose of participation in the gaming. (4) Subsection (5) applies where— (a) a chargeable person participates in remote gaming in reliance on an offer which waives all or part of a gaming payment, and (b) that offer has been won in the course of the person's participation in the gaming (and the person was not given the choice of receiving a different benefit instead of the offer). (5) The amount which would, apart from this subsection, be treated by section 159(4)(a) or (b) as a gaming payment (or additional gaming payment) is not to be so treated. (6) For the purposes of this section, where a payment is made out of moneys which include both excluded winnings and money which is not excluded winnings (the “other funds”), the payment is not taken to be made out of excluded winnings except so far as the amount of the payment exceeds the amount of those other funds. (7) In this section “money” includes any amount credited and any other money's worth.

Your change, as a redline

159A Play using the results of successful freeplay

(1) Where a chargeable person participates in remote gaming, an amount is not to be taken into account in determining the “gaming payment” (if any) under section 159 so far as the amount is paid out of money in relation to which the first and second conditions are met (“excluded winnings”). (2) The first condition is that the money has been won by participation in the gaming either— (a) in reliance on an offer which waives all or part of a gaming payment, or (b) in a case where the gaming payment was paid out of money in relation to which this condition and the second condition were met. (3) The second condition is that the chargeable person is not entitled to use the money otherwise than for the purpose of participation in the gaming. (4) Subsection (5) applies where— (a) a chargeable person participates in remote gaming in reliance on an offer which waives all or part of a gaming payment, and (b) that offer has been won in the course of the person's participation in the gaming (and the person was not given the choice of receiving a different benefit instead of the offer). (5) The amount which would, apart from this subsection, be treated by section 159(4)(a) or (b) as a gaming payment (or additional gaming payment) is not to be so treated. (6) For the purposes of this section, where a payment is made out of moneys which include both excluded winnings and money which is not excluded winnings (the “other funds”), the payment is not taken to be made out of excluded winnings except so far as the amount of the payment exceeds the amount of those other funds. (7) In this section “money” includes any amount credited and any other money's worth.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds