The Reporting Cryptoasset Service Providers (Due Diligence and Reporting Requirements) Regulations 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
9 Provision of information to HMRC
(1) In order to determine whether or not the obligations arising under these Regulations have been complied with, an officer of Revenue and Customs may require a reporting cryptoasset service provider on whom the officer reasonably suspects these Regulations impose obligations, to provide such information and documents as the officer reasonably requires as specified by written notice. (2) The information required by notice under paragraph (1) must be provided— (a) within such period, being no less than 14 days, and (b) by such means and in such form, as is reasonably required by the officer of Revenue and Customs.
9 Provision of information to HMRC
(1) In order to determine whether or not the obligations arising under these Regulations have been complied with, an officer of Revenue and Customs may require a reporting cryptoasset service provider on whom the officer reasonably suspects these Regulations impose obligations, to provide such information and documents as the officer reasonably requires as specified by written notice. (2) The information required by notice under paragraph (1) must be provided— (a) within such period, being no less than 14 days, and (b) by such means and in such form, as is reasonably required by the officer of Revenue and Customs.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.